It would be in the manufacturer's self-interest to list all applications that fit, so I would give credence to the listing's specific note of not working on C body Mopars. Possibly the pitman arm hits? Or steering linkage? Or too close to the steering box? Technically C bodies were 1965 but in the popular vernacular people lump in earlier big platform Mopars like yours. http://www.ttiexhaust.com/Header-C6573-178/Cbodyheaders.htm for example specifically starts with 1965. You can possibly have custom headers made that will fit. See http://www.stainlessheaders.com/customheaders for instance. http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tech/0310phr_jack_burns_exhaust_manifold_header_tech/index.html is a tech "Header Science" article about how headers work, fyi. Since shorty headers fit you could replace those beat up ones on the engine with some new ones. http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/ml-bettis64.html reports on his 1964 Chrysler. Let us know how it goes.... Thanks, Gary H. > -------Original Message------- > It's kind of a grey area, I've always considered it a C-Body, but I guess > technically the C-Platform didn't arrive at Chrysler until 65. The car is > considerably different than a 65 Newport, much closer to a 64 Fury anyhow. > > It has rusty, beat up shorty headers on it now....I guess I could take a > chance on the Dougs (the big $450 experiment, could always resell them if > they don't fit)...I'd be suprised if they'll fit in a 62+ Coronet, > Belvedere or Fury that they wouldn't fit the Newport..... > > Jay > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group. To post to this group, send email to 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 1962to1965mopars+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.