Re: Poly 318 valve covers?

[Gary Pavlovich <glpavlovich@xxxxxxx>]

Bill,

Our tastes are similar.  Both my Mopars have 100% stock, interior/exterior 
appearance (well - Ok, they do have a couple aftermarket gauges mounted 
under the dash, but purposefully inconspicuous) yet "Built" under the hood 
w/Hot-Rod nostalgia add-ons for the Plymouth and disguised or hidden HP 
parts on the 340 Dart (mid to high twelve's w/ the mild internal 
modifications).

I designed the custom Poly Tunnel Ram to fit under the hood of my Plymouth 
for stealth reasons.  There is little clue to what lays under the hood by 
examining the car from inside the cab (huge orig. steering wheel, pushbutton 
trans...) or outside (steel wheels w/original stainless hubcaps...) but the 
Poker face smiles when you lift the hood and all the cards are on the table, 
so to speak.

My general preference is to "look" OEM, all-original but go like stink when 
you hammer it.

However, if it looks modified, it better be fast enough to justify the 
image.

Gary P.

If it is
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill" <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: Poly 318 valve covers?


> I'm a big fan of make it look stock, but doesn't have to run that way. I
> certainly don't mind the aftermarket dress-up parts you'll probably never
> see anything but a chrome air cleaner on any of my cars...just my taste.
>
> And as far as parts "must satisfy the HP & Torque
> goals.requirements...before adding glitz" and I agree 100%. Valve covers,
> braided hoses, etc. don't make it go faster which is why I won't buy them,
> besides personal taste. I'm not saying dress-up stuff doesn't look good if
> done right, but most aftermarket stuff like that is just not for me. I'd
> much rather spend my precious few dollars on something that will make it
> faster. Just my $0.02
>
> Bill M
> 65 Coronet 500 'vert http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo62008.html
> 73 Dart Sport, 00 Cherokee Sport, 05 Ram 2500 CTD, 4WD, QC, LB, Laramie
> 21 Model T Depot Hack, 92 Accord, 06 Mazda 3
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Gary Pavlovich <glpavlovich@xxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
>
> > Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but limiting yourself to $60 for any
> > dress-up part won't get you far.
> >
> > I think the parts & components added to any engine build must first 
> > satisfy
> > the HP & Torque goals/requirements of the engine before adding glitz or
> > "show" that doesn't make it go any faster.
> >
> > The glitz or show addition, in my opinion, should be commensurate with 
> > the
> > value or expense of the engine; $500 for covers added to a $5000+ engine
> > would make sense to me if one could afford it.
> >
> > Gary P.
>
> --
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --  
> directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and 
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended 
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect 
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content 
> signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and 
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.