Re: Hagerty vs Grundy vs Heacock vs ???

[Gary Wilson <Gwwilson67@xxxxxxxxx>]

I have Hagerty and have been pleased with it.  I backed into my Vette and they 
paid agreed value with no problem.  I was able to buy it back and still have 
money to fix it.  It sounds like both companies are good.


----- Original Message ----
From: Tom Watters <tomwatters@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wed, February 16, 2011 7:33:29 AM
Subject: Re: Hagerty vs Grundy vs Heacock vs ???

I've been happy with Hagerty on my Dart.  Never had a claim, used the 
towing once.  At $125/year for the Dart cant shake a stick at it.  
Hagerty has never really even asked about mileage.

The only thing, like Dan said, I tried to add my 77 ramcharger, and they 
wouldnt take it, cuz it wasnt pretty enough.  They said if it was 
restored, they would insure it.

I have a friend with an A100 as well.  I think he uses Grundy and is 
happy with it.

--Tom

On 2/16/2011 7:30 AM, Dan McCormack wrote:
> They're both good companies Bill. I was with Hagerty for years until I bought 
>an A-100 van and they didn't want to take it. Grundy agreed to insure the van so 
>I switched everything over to them. I no longer have the van so I was going to 
>switch back to Hagerty but it turns out Grundy was a little cheaper. Grundy has 
>unlimited mileage, I'm not sure if Hagerty does or not. Whoever you go with make 
>sure it's an AGREED VALUE policy not Stated Value.
> BTW I sold the van to a good friend of mine and he has it insured with guess 
>who! Hagerty. I guess they woke up to the fact that old vans are collectable.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill [mailto:Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:14 AM
> To: mml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 62-65 Mopar List
> Subject: Hagerty vs Grundy vs Heacock vs ???
>
>
> Anyone have anything good, bad, or indifferent to say about these
> classic car insurers, or another competitor?
>
> I'm hunting for another company as JC Taylor is ticking me off and
> would like some input on experiences.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Bill M
> 65 Coronet 500 'vert http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo62008.html
> 73 Dart Sport, 00 Cherokee Sport, 05 Ram 2500 CTD, 4WD, QC, LB, Laramie
> 21 Model T Depot Hack, 92 Accord, 06 Mazda 3
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly 
>to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as 
>other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse 
>public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume 
>of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and 
>http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>
>
>


      


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.