I also am guilty of being a biker with mopars i ride a 1991 ultra classic with 90k on it now and it is at the front of my shop I rode a old panhead (duo glide)for 25 years before the ultra,My dad rode bsa's in the 50's and has always been a mopar man guess thats where i got it from my hero god rest his soul i'll never forget the look on his face when i rode my sporster in the driveway shortly after my 18th birthday --- On Wed, 2/9/11, William Harrison <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: William Harrison <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: New member message > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > Date: Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 6:52 AM > Don't apologize for mentioning > motorcycles. > Chrysler did make a motorcycle named the tomahawk but it > didn't go 400 mph. It had 400 hp. It was a viper v 10 that > was detuned. > I saw the bike one year when I was at Sturgis South > Dakota. > BTW.... To the a@#hole calling me or anyone that rides a > bike.....It is easy to call someone names by using the > internet as a shield. > I doubt very much that you would use the name "fag" if you > were face to face with me or one of my friends, though "you" > might be stupid enough to use the word. > Sometimes we do get sidetracked but I have yet to see it > harm someone, though it could happen to you. > Being an older biker at 66, I will still go face to face in > real life. > Later > Bill Harrison > 65 Coronet 2 dr post > > --- On Wed, 2/9/11, MO ( Steve Mick) <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > From: MO ( Steve Mick) <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: New member message > > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > > Date: Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 1:26 AM > > > > I apologize, I am the offender.I started it. I was > > welcoming a new member who mentioned he had been into > > motorcycles for many years and now is a 62-65 Mopar > > fan. He described how he felt about owning a Mopar > > similar to feelings about Bikes- I could identify with > that > > and told him I had Harleys for 40+ years.I sure hope > all > > this does not make him not want to be with us. I am > not very > > politically correct and sometimes stray from strictly > 62-65 > > Mopar facts. Please forgive me. BTW I sure did > enjoy > > the responces to Dodger's survey.................MO > > > > {Steve Mick} > > http://stevemick1964dodge.shutterfly.com/pictures/5 > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cory Rempel" > <cory_383@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 7:51 PM > > Subject: RE: New member message > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just curious. What's up with bike chatter? > > I've seen things go off topic before but come on. I > > don't recall Chrysler making any bikes. > > > > > >> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > > >> From: 63sprtfury@xxxxxxxxx > > >> Subject: Re: New member message > > >> Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 18:48:36 -0600 > > >> > > >> I've got an '03 Electra Glide Ultra Classic, > 95" > > Twin cam with > > >> Screamin Eagle Heads, Cams and Vance & > Hines > > Headers and tuner. Just > > >> got rid of my Wide Glide last Spring. > > >> Can't resist hot rodding them any more than I > can > > the Plymouth. Mines > > >> not sitting in the back shed though, it gets > > riddin regular, more than > > >> the Plymouth gets driven, though that isn't > in > > moth balls either. > > >> > > >> Doug, > > >> '63 Sport Fury 'vert > > >> > > >> > Know the feeling Steve - love my bikes > as > > well. Have a '05 FXDC and a > Ducati 900FE sitting > in the > > shed, but here's where I start > rationalizing ... > just > > don't seem to have the time lately to ride them. > > I > > wonder how many of our fellow Mopar enthusiasts have a > HOG > > or similar > parked in the back shed. > > >> > I guess at heart we are petrol heads !! > > >> > Cheers, > > > > > > -- > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > ---- > > > Please address private mail -- mail of interest > to > > only one person -- directly to that person. > > I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as > well > > as other personal messages only to the intended > recipient, > > not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice > will > > protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail > and > > fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. > Thanks! > > > > > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion > Guidelines: > > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to > only one > > person -- directly to that person. I.e., send > > parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as > other > > personal messages only to the intended recipient, not > to the > > Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect > your > > privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune > the > > content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! > > > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. > > > > > > >