Re: Am I the only sane person left??

[William Harrison <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx>]

Can't say I've seen her on Speed or ESPN; so if she's not on either one of those shows, I could care less.....
JMHO.
Later
Bill

--- On Sat, 10/16/10, Joey <jake4@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Joey <jake4@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Am I the only sane  person left??
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Saturday, October 16, 2010, 8:36 AM
> 
> the only pole I want to see nancy grace on is the one
> sticking through her heart, even then I would want a priest
> to verify.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: "MO ( Steve Mick)" <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2010 1:56 AM
> Subject: Re: Am I the only sane person left??
> 
> 
> > 
> > Is Nancy Grace a pole dancer ? Maybe been on both Dr.
> Phil and Jerry Springer?? Whose BS level is higher, Jerry or
> Maury Pavlovich ( Gary- pun intended :-) 
> )...................................MO
> > {Steve Mick}
> > http://stevemick.shutterfly.com/pictures#Part%202
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joey" <jake4@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 8:58 PM
> > Subject: Re: Am I the only sane person left??
> > 
> > 
> >> 
> >> Whatta ya mean you don't believe anything you
> hear, can nancy grace and dr.phil be feeding us bullshit, oh
> my, that leaves only jerry springer to carry on the truth.
> >> 
> >> Joey
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "MO ( Steve
> Mick)" <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 9:40 PM
> >> Subject: Re: Am I the only sane person left??
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>> Isn't this the same video that has a large
> portion of the chevy roof taken out? with the engine and
> tranny removed, and a lot of the roof, the chebby is
> significantly weakened structurally. Naturally the auto that
> is heavier because it has it's engine and tranny is going to
> be more the hitter than the hitee. Everything  from
> brake fluid to motor oil can be " spun" into whatever fits
> an agenda.  I hardly believe anything I hear or read,
> and durn little of what I see! :-)  .........MO
> >>> {Steve Mick}
> >>> http://stevemick.shutterfly.com/pictures#Part%202
> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul
> Lennemann" <pjlenn@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 7:08 PM
> >>> Subject: RE: Am I the only sane person left??
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> It's probably the same video that I've
> seen.  As I recall it was not
> >>>> totally head to head but offset and more
> like headlight to headlight. I
> >>>> was surprised to see the damage to the Bel
> Air but when I look at my 63
> >>>> Unibody car I can see how it would
> happen.  I have a lot of faith in
> >>>> modern safety engineering.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Paul L.
> >>>> '63 Sport Fury
> >>>> 440/727
> >>>> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/ml-lennemann63.html
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Cory Rempel wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> This is off topic but I gotta know
> what you all think.  On you tube
> >>>>> there's a crash test between a 2009
> malibu and a 59 bel air.  If you
> >>>>> watch it you can clearly see there's
> no power train in the old cheby. I
> >>>>> pointed this out and about 90% of
> respondents made comments like "That's
> >>>>> irrelevant, the bel air is a death
> trap"  and "The engine would fly onto
> >>>>> the drivers lap".  I say these
> people are idiots at best.  There's NO
> >>>>> WAY that big old car is going to
> crumple the way it does with an intact
> >>>>> drive train.  For those of you
> who haven't seen this, please look at it.
> >>>>>  I would like as much feed back
> as possible.  People, tell me if I'm
> >>>>> crazy or not!!!
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> [Non-text portions of this message
> have been removed]
> >>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> ----
> >>>> Please address private mail -- mail of
> interest to only one person --  directly to that
> person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the
> intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address.
> This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total
> volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar
> topic.  Thanks!
> >>>> 
> >>>> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion
> Guidelines:
> >>>> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> ----
> >>> Please address private mail -- mail of
> interest to only one person --  directly to that
> person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the
> intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address.
> This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total
> volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar
> topic.  Thanks!
> >>> 
> >>> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion
> Guidelines:
> >>> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> >> 
> >> 
> >> ----
> >> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person --  directly to that person. 
> I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well
> as other personal messages only to the intended recipient,
> not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will
> protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and
> fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> >> 
> >> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion
> Guidelines:
> >> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person --  directly to that person. 
> I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well
> as other personal messages only to the intended recipient,
> not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will
> protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and
> fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> > 
> > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> 
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
> person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send
> parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other
> personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your
> privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
> content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> 
> 
>