Steve, you just sent chills up and down my back......visual overload! Herb -------Original Message------- From: MO ( Steve Mick) Date: 10/16/2010 12:56:16 AM To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Am I the only sane person left?? Is Nancy Grace a pole dancer ? Maybe been on both Dr. Phil and Jerry Springer?? Whose BS level is higher, Jerry or Maury Pavlovich ( Gary- pun intended :-) )...................................MO {Steve Mick} http://stevemick.shutterfly.com/pictures#Part%202 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joey" <jake4@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 8:58 PM Subject: Re: Am I the only sane person left?? > > Whatta ya mean you don't believe anything you hear, can nancy grace and > dr.phil be feeding us bullshit, oh my, that leaves only jerry springer to > carry on the truth. > > Joey > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "MO ( Steve Mick)" <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 9:40 PM > Subject: Re: Am I the only sane person left?? > > >> >> Isn't this the same video that has a large portion of the chevy roof >> taken out? with the engine and tranny removed, and a lot of the roof, >> the chebby is significantly weakened structurally. Naturally the auto >> that is heavier because it has it's engine and tranny is going to be more >> the hitter than the hitee. Everything from brake fluid to motor oil can >> be " spun" into whatever fits an agenda. I hardly believe anything I >> hear or read, and durn little of what I see! :-) .........MO >> {Steve Mick} >> http://stevemick.shutterfly.com/pictures#Part%202 >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Paul Lennemann" <pjlenn@xxxxxxxxx> >> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 7:08 PM >> Subject: RE: Am I the only sane person left?? >> >> >>> >>> It's probably the same video that I've seen. As I recall it was not >>> totally head to head but offset and more like headlight to headlight. I >>> was surprised to see the damage to the Bel Air but when I look at my 63 >>> Unibody car I can see how it would happen. I have a lot of faith in >>> modern safety engineering. >>> >>> Paul L. >>> '63 Sport Fury >>> 440/727 >>> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/ml-lennemann63.html >>> >>> >>> Cory Rempel wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> This is off topic but I gotta know what you all think. On you tube >>>> there's a crash test between a 2009 malibu and a 59 bel air. If you >>>> watch it you can clearly see there's no power train in the old cheby. >>>> I >>>> pointed this out and about 90% of respondents made comments like >>>> "That's >>>> irrelevant, the bel air is a death trap" and "The engine would fly >>>> onto >>>> the drivers lap". I say these people are idiots at best. There's NO >>>> WAY that big old car is going to crumple the way it does with an intact >>>> drive train. For those of you who haven't seen this, please look at >>>> it. >>>> I would like as much feed back as possible. People, tell me if I'm >>>> crazy or not!!! >>>> -- >>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >>>> >>> >>> >>> ---- >>> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- >>> directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and >>> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended >>> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will >>> protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the >>> content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! >>> >>> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: >>> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and >>> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. >>> >>> >> >> >> ---- >> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- >> directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and >> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended >> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will >> protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the >> content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! >> >> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: >> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > > > ---- > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- > directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and > negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended > recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect > your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content > signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > > > ---- Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www 1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ---- Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. This email was sent to: arc.6265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx u/?bUrDWg.bSONJP.YXJjLjYy ?p=TEXFOOTER