Re: tapered axle strength
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: tapered axle strength




that is the et range i am aiming for (11.50 to 12.30)
how does the ball and trunion hold up ?
how about the smaller u joint /
----- Original Message ----- From: "mike stas" <cruisermike426@xxxxxxx>
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 6:46 PM
Subject: RE: tapered axle strength





I raced a 62 plymouth fury back in the 70's. 383 2 x 4 barrels with a 4.88 rear. Tapered axles. Car ran in SS/HA on the record along Callahan & Sulu (the Villian) who held the record at 11.88.
They won the first gatornationals back in the 70's with this car in F/SA.
My car ran the same times
The name on my car was OVERDOSE.
We both ran in Northeast Division 1.
We both had tapered axles. NO PROBLEM. These cars were pushing close to 500HP.

CruiserMike
New Jersey


To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
From: peaver63@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: tapered axle strength
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:24:27 -0500


You won't break the axles.
The problem was shearing the key in the hub.
But I doubt you'd ever do that either.

Jimmy

On 9/12/2010 6:19 PM, gerry peters wrote:
>
> Does anyone have race experience with the 8.75 tapered axle diff ?
> The car will have 9" slicks 727 and 3.55s or 4.10s
>
> i.e.How much hp can they withstand in a 4000 lb car and for how long ?
> If they break ,where will they break ?
>
> I know the easy answer is to change to the complete 65 and up diff .
>
> The advantage to the 1963 rear end is they are only an inch wider then > an a body 8.75
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- > directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and > negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended > recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will > protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the > content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>
>
>


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.


--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.




----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.












Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.