It's '67 and later.
Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: Dodger7998@xxxxxxx
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 9:09:48 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: New Project
Hmmm,,,,,,,,guess I am not following this, it was my understanding that
aftermarket convertors were the same from like 66 to early 80s, and it has
been a standard to replace the input shaft on our early cable shift trannys to
accept the latter TCs ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Please enlighten me,,,,,,
In a message dated 4/16/2010 12:36:14 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
chymar01@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
The crank center register for the torque converter is a different
size(larger) on the 340 than the 318. Someone used to make an adapter/spacer to
make up the difference.
If you only have the 340 block, use the 318 crank and rods. The crank is
forged and the rods are bushed for floating pins.
Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nico Over"<nover@xxxxxxxx>
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 8:50:19 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: New Project
Ollie, actually that is not a bad idea. I have a 68 340 block but it is 60
over so don't know if it is still usable. Let me do some thinking on this.
Question will the 65 318 poly trans bolt to a 68 340 block?
Thanks
Nico
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:31:34 -0500, Ollie wrote
Nico,
I will probably get hammered for this one.......
If I was redoing another vehicle, unless it is a super stocker; I
would very seriously consider going with a 340 vs 440. my reasons
more user friendly fuel wise/ daily driver less common eng/we are
rapidly approaching the 440 show in our Mopars, i.e. the 350 ch***y
in everything better fit / less cooling problems Just my $
.02..presented free of charge Ollie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ollie"<satellite1965@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:<1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: New Project
The rocker chrome on the Bel was a much smaller piece than the
Satellite.
The Satellite is as wide as the rocker itself.
Ollie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nico Over"<nover@xxxxxxxx>
To:<1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: New Project
Thanks Ollie for the info, my Bel II has side and rocker chrome with
bench
seats. The 318 is seized but am intending to put a 440 in it anyway.
Nico
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:56:20 -0500, Ollie wrote
65 Satellites did come with bench seats. To my best knowdlege the
production
#'s
13,139 w/interior chrome and bucket seats
9,663 bench seats and no interior chrome
1,837 convertiables
254 426 ci automatics
23 426 4 speeds
As John said Satellites had no side chrome, but wheel well and
rocker panel chrome, plus the rear side "shark gills" They were an
up graded Belvedere, I and II being post and no post cars. Ollie
----- Original Message -----
From: "John"<jswask@xxxxxxx>
To:<1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 1:42 PM
Subject: RE: New Project
Nico, Also the belvedere II had trim down the sides, why'll the
Sat.
only
had shark gills on the rear qtrs.and had trim on the top edge
were the
window comes out of the door., where you would rest you arm as you
would
be cruising John Wask...
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
From: ledman_70@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: New Project
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:16:59 +0000
Satellites generally had console/buckets, but that may not
ALWAYS
have
been the case.
Nico Over wrote:
All, I am not an authority on the 65 cars by any stretch and
after
cleaning
out all the parts in the car I found a emblem that says
Belvedere
II so
I
guess it is not a Satellite, don't really know what the
difference
between
the two models are except maybe the Satellite was the upper
scale
model
for
the model year?? Anyone, can you enlighten me. Thanks
Nico
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:23:09 -0700 (PDT), Donald Gallimore
wrote
Another '65 Satellite Convertible owner. Let me know if you
need
any reference photos, etc.
Akron Don Gallimore
----- Original Message ----
From: Rich Kinsley<rlkinsley@xxxxxxxxx>
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu, April 15, 2010 10:20:03 AM
Subject: RE: New Project
Good for you! Gee I love wagons and yours is just like my
folks
used
to
have but it had a 2bl 383. Quite a runner!
Rich Kinsley '64 Dodge
Polara 4dr 318poly
w/goodies
=====================================================================
Nico
Over wrote:
Just wanted to let everyone know that yesterday I
accidently acquired
another
project car. While delivering some
stuff to a guy's business, I spottted
a 65
Plymouth Satelite
convertible sitting in a shed. I asked what he was
going to
do
with it and he said its going to the junk yard. I said you
can't do
that
and he offerred the car to me for $100.00. So now I have a
almost
complete 65
vert, 318 auto. Pans seen good but has some cowl
and qtr panel rust.
Wife
says something has to go so if anyone
needs a 63 Dodge 9 passenger wagon
or
parts I'll make a heck
of a deal, pls contact me off list.
Another one saved!
Nico
Over
Virginia Beach, Va.
63 Dodge 330 2dr post 440
63
Dodge 440 wagon
64 Plymouth Sport Fury 451 4 spped
65 Plymouth
Satelite 318 vert
Rich Kinsley '64 Dodge Polara 4dr 318poly
w/goodies
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send
parts/car
transactions and negotiations as well as other personal
messages
only to
the
intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address.
This
practice
will
protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and
fine
tune
the
content
signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse
Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
person --
directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions
and
negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the
intended
recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice
will
protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and
fine
tune
the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. --^--
--------------------------------------------------------------
This
email was sent to: nover@xxxxxxxx
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here:
help/unsub.html.bm92ZXJA
For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutions
visit:
Jeff Adams
64 Polara
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
person --
directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and
negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the
intended
recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice
will
protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine
tune
the
content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple
calendars
with
Hotmail.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID28
326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5
--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network