RE: transmission mount

[Nick Tiberio <furyus63@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Brian,

Did you need the full 1/2 inch set back or could you have used less. 
What is your new clearance with the modification. I used a 1/8 inch shim 
under the right mount to get clearance. I'm getting ready to do another 
engine swap and those 8 bottom water jacket header bolts alone will put 
you in theropy. Milodone said there may be a oil pan clearance issue 
with the right front K-frame. The set back may eliminate this issue.

Nick Tiberio
FuryUs63





Brian Safford wrote:
> 
> Thanks ... but I was able to modify my original mount so I don't think
> I need one anymore.
> 
> Brian
> 
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Don Hudson<mopar4me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I might have one from a 65 Coronet with poly & 727 I parted out. =A0I'll 
> > =
> have
> > to look.
> > Don in VA
> >
> > Brian Safford wrote:
> >>
> >> My transmission mount is one of those that has a spring in it ... the
> >> guy I spoke with at Schumacher Creative Services said if I could find
> >> a crossmember from a 63, 64 or 65 automatic, I could switch over to
> >> the type they sell and it would be a lot easier to do what I'm trying
> >> to do.
> >>
> >> Anyone have a 63, 64 or 65 crossmember from an automatic they'd like
> >> to part with?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Brian
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Brian Safford<hzf9vv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I've managed to move my poly 318 1/2 inch towards the rear so my TTI
> >>> headers will fit better, and I've modified my original trans mount
> >>> holes by 1/2 inch as well.
> >>>
> >>> Problem is that now the trans mount interferes with the parking sprag
> >>> housing.
> >>>
> >>> I can further modify the trans mount by removing material so as to
> >>> remove the interference but am wondering if there might be a better
> >>> solution.
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance,
> >>> Brian
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Sent from my mobile device
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----
> >> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> >> directly to that person. =A0I.e., send parts/car transactions and 
> >> negoti=
> ations
> >> as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not 
> >> t=
> o
> >> the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
> >> reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to 
> >> Mopa=
> r
> >> topic. =A0Thanks!
> >>
> >> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> >> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> > directly to that person. =A0I.e., send parts/car transactions and 
> > negotia=
> tions
> > as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not 
> > to
> > the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
> > reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to 
> > Mopar
> > topic. =A0Thanks!
> >
> > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
> >
> >
> >
> >



furyus63


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.