
Re: Cam Questions
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cam Questions
- From: Don Dulmage <big-d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:23:28 -0500
lobe lift (off the pushrod since that is working for you) X 1.5 -.006= net
valve lift for hydraulic cams. Because a hydraulic lifter bleeds down it is
almost impossible to get a lift figure using it.. If you had adjustable
rockers you could pop in a solid lifter and set it at zero lash. The - .006
and the amount the hydraulic lifter sucks up in the process of absorbing
the wack. BUTTTTTTTTT if that was a solid cam there would not be .006 but
.024 to .032" valve lash.
Since we are on the subject anyway let me say Cam specs area given even for
solids at .000" lash for most manufacuturers. No one thinks of this so they
run a .510 list solid lifter cam thinking that will be better than a .510
lift hydraulic forgetting in the process that the solid cam specs are at
.000" lash and in reality that cam will have only .486 lift with its .024
valve lash whu ile its hydraulic twin will give the whole .510" minus
about.006 for 504" lift in actual running conditions. On top of that the
solid cam has long ramps to ease the lifter up snug and let it down so it
doesnt bounce . These take up about 7 degrees either end of the lobe so it
wastes about 14 degrees total duration just getting ready to work. The
hydraulic doesnt need this since it is right there snug on the end of the
pushrod all the time so less duration is required for the same RPM. range.
That is why we often compare durations at .050" and .100" and even .200"
just to make sure what we are actually gettting. So whay do we use solids?
Because first years ago before the late sixties it was not possible to turn
higher Rpms with hydraulics so solids were an automatic choice. Even now my
Max wedge never sees above 6500 . It doesnt need to so i run a hydraulic cam
of similar lift and duration as the old Max Wedge solid cam but I get more
performance for the above reasons. Since i never need to go to 7000+ it is
for me a no brainer.
Now i know your buddies with their little duntov corvettes and such will get
ticked off if you try and explain this to them and those who are in love
with solids will also. That is the wonderful thing about the truth. It
doesnt matter who believes it. It is not a demoratic function based on
votes. It is just the truth , period. Sometimes in a racecar you cant find
a cam you like in hydraulic grinds and so you search solids keeping in mind
the principles mentioned above. If you do your math right and allow extra
duration and extra lift because of the ramp thing and the valve lash, it
works. If not it doesnt.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dennis C." <dennis.2914@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 12:45 AM
Subject: Cam Questions
Hello,
Does anyone know what the stock rocker ratio is for a 383?
Do the stock rockers have the same ratio for intake and exhaust?
And last, is it possible to get a rough idea what the lift is of an
installed cam with hydraulic lifters by reading the lift at the pushrod
end of the rocker with a dial indicator? I can not reach the valve end
of the rockers with my dial indicator stand.
Any help will be appreciated.
Dennis C.
1996 Dodge Ram 3500 Van Conversion
1964 Plymouth Belvedere 318 Auto
1963 Plymouth Sport Fury 383 4-speed
1949 Dodge Pickup 289/C4 soon to be changed
1998 Honda Valkyrie Standard
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and
negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network