Re: 318 intakes

[Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sean,

I wouldn't count on that. Your C-Body will LOVE the 4 barrel...and you
won't believe the difference that a factory 4-bbl and a Holley 600 or
a Thermoquad will make with a stock cam!

Go for it...you won't be sorry!

Bill M
65 Coronet 500 'vert

On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Sean B <polecat2@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'd love to go 4BBL!  But the stock 318 would have a stroke, I fear.
> It's in a big ol' C-body.  I guess I'll stick with the dual plane.
>
> Thanks, Gary
>
> Sean
>
>
> spigot2039@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> Generally a single plane manifold's design likes a high-rpm situation;
>> dual plane is more applicable with a variety of rpm use. I don't know
>> why Chrysler made a 2-bbl single plane, given these assumptions.
>>
>> Since you'll have the manifold off the other option is to switch to an
>> 4BBL. ;-)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gary H.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> >I have to replace the intake gasket on my 1969 318 two-barrel engine
>> >because it is leaking oil out the front end.  It is a factory dual
>> >plane.  My friend has a factory two-barrel single plane from a 1970 318.
>> >It is very cool, and looks like a Street Dominator intake.  My engine is
>> >all stock but for dual exhaust, automatic trans and 2.76 gears.  Which
>> >intake manifold should I use?  I just putter around with the car.


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.