Re: green bearing questions
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: green bearing questions



You just didn't explain why it was only a 2 yr. car. That's all I said to confirm.

George


--- On Mon, 8/11/08, wmp4@xxxxxxxxxxxx <wmp4@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: wmp4@xxxxxxxxxxxx <wmp4@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: green bearing questions
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Monday, August 11, 2008, 8:06 AM
> William Paxton
> wmp4@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
>         Isn't that what I said?
> 
> 
> 
> bt6t4@xxxxxxxxx 
> 08/11/2008 09:58 AM
> Please respond to
> 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> To
> 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> cc
> 
> Subject
> Re: green bearing questions
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The DEmon was only a 2year run.The religious right had a
> cow about 
> satanism or some such.
> 
> George
> 
> 
> --- On Mon, 8/11/08, wmp4@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> <wmp4@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > From: wmp4@xxxxxxxxxxxx <wmp4@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: green bearing questions
> > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Monday, August 11, 2008, 3:35 AM
> > William Paxton
> > wmp4@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > 
> >         I thought that the Demon was only made in 71
> and 72
> > and never had 
> > a 360 as that came out in mid year 73!
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Herb <zephyr9900@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
> > 08/09/2008 01:12 AM
> > Please respond to
> > 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > 
> > To
> > 1962 to 1965 Mopars
> <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > cc
> > 
> > Subject
> > Re: green bearing questions
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Dan; 
> > 
> > I hate to be this bold but, Auto Hobby Digest is
> wrong!!
> > Because the car I
> > got my parts from was new and I did all the work on it
> from
> > the day it 
> > left
> > the dealers lot. The night he got the car we pulled
> the
> > 3:23 pumpkin out &
> > put 4:11 pumpkin back in, so I know it was factory
> 8.75
> > with 4.5 bolt
> > pattern!  I distinctly remember being sooo envious
> being
> > able to use real
> > wheels. (-;    Also a racing friend of mine had a 67
> Dart
> > that he did the
> > same swap and if my memory is correct he got his from
> a 74
> > 360 Demon. Just
> > the facts as I know them!  Now I am going to have to
> hit a
> > few junk yards
> > and get photos!!
> > 
> > 
> > Herb 
> > 
> > 1963 Sport Fury Convertible 361 
> > 1970 Challenger RT 440 
> > 1999 Durango SLT 5.9 
> > 2006 300-C Heritage 5.7 
> > 2008 SRT-8 Magnum 6.1 
> > St. Louis, MO. 
> > 
> > 
> > -------Original Message------- 
> > 
> > From: Dan McCormack 
> > Date: 8/8/2008 9:38:17 PM 
> > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx 
> > Subject: Re: green bearing questions 
> > 
> > Herb and Steve, I'm not saying you guys are wrong
> or
> > mistaken because as 
> > we 
> > All know "Never Say Never with Mopar"
> Personally
> > I've never see a 73-76 A 
> > Body with an 8 3/4 factory rear end even in a 340 or
> 360
> > car. They've all 
> > Had a Spicer 8 1/4 in them. 
> > 
> > Again you can't believe everything you read but
> > here's a quote from Auto 
> > Hobby Digest: 
> > 
> > "All of the A-body 8-3/4's were small bolt
> pattern
> > axles (5x4") without 
> > Exception." 
> > 
> > I do have to disagree with you Steve about the B body
> rear
> > end however. My 
> > 
> > Friend is running a 68 B body rear end in his 73
> Duster
> > 340. He didn't 
> > have 
> > To narrow the B body rear end but he did have to move
> the
> > spring perches. 
> > Here is some more info from Auto Hobby Digest: 
> > 
> > "Another 8-3/4" option is to use a B-body
> > 8-3/4" rear end. There were 
> > Several different widths used in B-bodies during the
> > sixties. The 1962-63 
> > B-body rear measured 53-1/4", It was changed in
> > 64,65,66,and again in 68. 
> > The 68-70 was approximately 55" wide. 1971 and
> later
> > B-bodies are too wide 
> > 
> > Of candidates. On Dusters and Dart Sports, the wider
> rear
> > end looks at 
> > home.
> > 
> > On early A-bodies (1963-66) its looks a little
> awkward.
> > While the 1962-63 
> > Rear end is only a sanct 3/4" wider than an
> A-bodies,
> > its downside is that 
> > 
> > The 1962-64 rear end uses a tapered axle that can be
> > difficult to work 
> > with.
> > 
> > 
> > All the 1962-70 B-body rear ends came with their
> spring
> > perches 44" apart, 
> > 
> > Whereas the A-bodies were 43" apart. With any
> B-body
> > rear end you will 
> > need 
> > To move the spring perches inward 1/2" on both
> > sides." 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Steve Chervinsky"
> > <63hemipolara@xxxxxxxxx> 
> > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> 
> > Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 7:05 PM 
> > Subject: Re: green bearing questions 
> > 
> > 
> > > Chrysler used the 8 3/4 right into 74. And in
> A-bodies
> > 73+ they were 
> > > 4.5" bolt circle. My fiends original 73
> Duster /6
> > had a 8 3/4 with a 
> > > 489 case. Meanwhile my 63 Polara has the small
> 741
> > case and the stupid 
> > > keyways for the drums. A B-body 8 3/4 will not
> fit an
> > A-body without 
> > > being narrowed.
> > 
> > 
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one
> > person -- 
> > directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car
> transactions
> > and 
> > negotiations as well as other personal messages only
> to the
> > intended 
> > recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This
> > practice will protect 
> > your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine
> tune
> > the content 
> > signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> > 
> > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion
> Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > 
> > 
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one
> > person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send
> parts/car
> > transactions and negotiations as well as other
> personal
> > messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
> > Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
> your
> > privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune
> the
> > content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> > 
> > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion
> Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
> person -- 
> directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions
> and 
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the
> intended 
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This
> practice will protect 
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune
> the content 
> signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
> 
>  
> 
> --
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
> person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car
> transactions and negotiations as well as other personal
> messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your
> privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
> content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 


      


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 












Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.