I have been using the Dot 5 for 3 years on my 64 440 and it works great. I had a new system so flushing was not an issue. I intend on using it in my wifes 64 Polarar 500 convert also. K. Leslie Thrasher wrote: > > I used it back in 2001 in my 62 Dart after I finished the restoration. > Everything was new--no flushing required--and I had no problems at all. > I > am using it in my current project, a 36 Dodge P/U w/Hemi, manual, no > booster > and it stops just fine. It seems to be a little thinner than Dot 3 and > will > leak if all connections aren't real tight. What I like about it is it > won't > peel your new paint off. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lee Sumpter" <leesumpter@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:58 AM > Subject: RE: Reg. vs. silicone brake fluid? > > > > > > Thanks for the link to this article. I was kind of undecided, but now am > > definitely NOT going to make the switch. > > > > Lee Sumpter > > > > > > Dan McCormack wrote: > > > > > > I'm not sold on silicone brake fluid myself. I've also heard stories of > > > people having a soft brake pedal especially at high altitudes. Here's an > > > > > > article I found online that has an explanation in it of the spongy > > > pedal. > > > > > > Dan > > > http://www.xs11.com/tips/maintenance/maint1.shtml > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Bill" <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx> > > > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 10:29 AM > > > Subject: Re: Reg. vs. silicone brake fluid? > > > > > > > > > >I had a friend that went through this a few years back...he decided > > > > that silicone was THE way to go. If my memory serves me right, He did > > > > some research and found that the seals needed to be upgraded to handle > > > > the silicone. So he spent quite a bit of time and $ for that, lots of > > > > $ on DOT 5 fluid, throughly flushed the system, did everything right, > > > > and then had a soft pedal @ the end that he couldn't get rid of. Even > > > > replaced the MC and it was still there. Finally went back to DOT 3 and > > > > problem was solved. I don't remember any more than what I put here, > > > > but I do remember he was cussing for spending all that $ for nothing! > > > > > > > > Bill M > > > > 65 Coronet 500 'vert > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Lee Sumpter <leesumpter@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> What are your opinions on using silicone brake fluid instaed of > regular > > > >> fluid in our cars? Do you have to replace all of the hoses and > > > >> cylinders, etc? Or can you just bleed the silicone fluid through the > > > >> wheel cylinders? > > > >> Thanks > > > >> Lee Sumpter 64 Fury > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- > directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and > negotiations > as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not > to > the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, > reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to > Mopar > topic. Thanks! > > > > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. > > > > > Kevin R. Merkley Thunder Bay, Ontario 64 Dodge 440 2dr HT (Cdn) 64 Dodge Polara 500 Convertible (Cdn) ---- Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.