Re: low deck intakes
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: low deck intakes



I thought it was a late 50's and a one year item.
--- Dave Casey <dcasey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> Ron's exactly right, except the RB 383 was seen in
> the early 60's, not late. 
> I believe it was only used in the Chrysler Windsor,
> but Bill Watson will 
> clear that up.
> 
> Dave Casey
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ron Crossley" <rcrossley@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 2:28 PM
> Subject: RE: low deck intakes
> 
> 
> >
> > Hi -
> >
> > I don't know why your source would tell you a 383
> intake won't fit a 361 
> > unless the 383 is a relatively rare Chrysler RB383
> from the late '60s. All 
> > the 'B' engines, 350,361,383(not the one rare one
> mentioned above) and 
> > 400) manifolds are interchangeable. All the 'RB'
> intakes, 413, 426, 440, 
> > arae interchangeable. The early RB 383
> interchanges with the other RB 
> > intakes.
> >
> > Ron
> >
> > '64 Sport Fury  440/727
> > '63 Sport Fury  383/727
> >
> >
> >>From: michael rofe <mblarofe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>Reply-To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>To: "1962to1965mopars@"
> <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>Subject: low deck intakes
> >>Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 05:21:03 +0900
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>i own a 1959 dodge custom royal 361 cu in it has a
> two barrell as standard 
> >>what 4 barrell intakes will fit i have an intake
> casting number 2806301 
> >>info on line tells me it is a 383 intake and its
> not supposed to fit a low 
> >>deck motor but it does and it runs good
> >>so what other intakes fit low decks that are not
> supposed to
> >>mick
> >>perth
> >>w.a.
> >>[Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
> >>
> >>
> >>----
> >>Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person -- 
> >>directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car
> transactions and 
> >>negotiations as well as other personal messages
> only to the intended 
> >>recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address.
> This practice will protect 
> >>your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and
> fine tune the content 
> >>signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> >>
> >>'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
>
>>http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person --  
> > directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car
> transactions and 
> > negotiations as well as other personal messages
> only to the intended 
> > recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address.
> This practice will protect 
> > your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and
> fine tune the content 
> > signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> >
> > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e.,
> send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well
> as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This
> practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total
> volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to
> Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
>
> 
> 
> 


George



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 












Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.