From: "Earl H. " <earlh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: flex fans
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:09:42 -0600
I forgot to mention that is one reason I hate them. They are flat
dangerous.
I have cut myself several times just working around them. I will never get
in
the line of rotation of a flex fan while the motor is running.
Earl
I had a friend that got him arm cut severely when a flex fan 'exploded'
while he was leaning over the front of his car. I stay FAR away from them.
Speaking of which, my 65 Coronet currently has a solid 'flex' style on it
that I want to get rid of ASAP. What came on the car from the factory?
This
looks like it could be original.
Bill M
65 Coronet 500 'vert
On 4/17/07, Earl H. <earlh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Sean,
>
> I will have to dis-agree with my learned friend. First let me say I
> hate flex fans. At low speed, they might scoop more air, but at high
> speeds they flatten out and don't flow as much air. In fact I have
> seen them effect
>
> high speed flow adversely. The best combo IMO is the good old Mopar
> 7 blade air conditioner fan on a thermo clutch. Nothing sucks as much
> air as a stock Mopar 7 blade air conditioner fan at low speeds.
>
> My truck has a special shroud I build with a long tunnel and a 7 blade
> fan and direct drive. If your in front of the truck and I rev it to 3
> grand,
>
> it will suck you into the grill. Just kidding, but almost.
>
> Earl
>
>
> Sean,
> I believe a flex fan scoops more air, creating more drag, and thus
> reducing HP.
> Gary Pavlovich
> -
>
>
> >
> > Will a flex fan make more power than a fixed radiator fan?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will
> protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune
> the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and
negotiations
as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to
the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar
topic. Thanks!
>
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
>
>
>
>
>
>
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and
negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network