
Re: HD 413/426 block
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: HD 413/426 block
- From: Bob Fortson <bobt1885@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 06:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
Joey..Not sure the idea was to have thicker cylinder
walls, but that may have resulted, I'm not sure. I
think the reason for doing this was to gain the
external ribbing that gives additional strength
against freezing and breakage in "outdoor" application
in the cold country.
Bob Fortson
--- Joeydahook9@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Your free subscription is supported by today's
> sponsor:
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
> Did president Bush react quickly enough to hurricane
> Katrina?
>
caad3P2bQmH9Ma/Nationwide
> Survey
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> While drooling over the forged rods (again) at
> _www.440source.com_
> (http://www.440source.com) , I found a bare block
> and caps for sale that were listed as
> "extra heavy duty" 413/426 block with a standard
> bore. The casting number
> is 2658836. There is a photo showing the heavy
> external ribbing, and the
> casting number comes back as "commercial" In the
> narrative they say these blocks
> were cast using 440 water jacket molds, but with a
> 413 bore. I guess this
> is supposed to have thick(er) cylinder walls? They
> want 194.95. Is this block
> that much better than other 413/426 blocks? I
> never saw one before, but it
> sure looks stout. Joe
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>
> Your free subscription is supported by today's
> sponsor:
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
> Oprah vs Dr. Phil- who is your favorite? Vote now.
> caad6r9bQmH9Mf/Your
> opinion
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person -- directly to that person. I.e.,
> send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well
> as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This
> practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total
> volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to
> Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
>
>
>
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network