RE: 64/65 Rear bumpers

[ntolerance <ntolerance@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

[AD removed for archives]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Like music?  Get a CD player on us. Click here.
caac2NUa/PermissionData
-------------------------------------------------------------------

WEll, thats what I thought. 65 was its own duck.

Then clearly this eBay lister is confused:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=4519559770&category=34204&sspagename=WDVW


Thats a 65 rear bumper (not a good pic).
I was just wondering if I sould be looking a 64 cars as well for my 
bumpers.

Thanks, Doc.

tduross1@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> I've got both and they're not even close.
> Sorry.
> 
> Tom Duross
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jimmy Peavy [mailto:peaver63@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 9:15 AM
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: 64/65 Rear bumpers
> 
> 
> Nope!
> 
> 
> 
> ntolerance wrote:
> 
> >
> >Do the 64 and 65 Dodge B body cars share the same rear bumpers?
> >How about the fronts?
> >
> >Thanks, Doc.
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 

[AD removed for archives]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Show your pride with a free* USA T-shirt.  Click here to confirm 
your address.
caac2N5f/PermissionData
-------------------------------------------------------------------

----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 



http:///u/?.