Re: Driveshaft Source - Conversion from ball and trunion
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Driveshaft Source - Conversion from ball and trunion



After taking a good look a the differences between a 64-65 833 main/output shaft and a later 66 up shaft I don't believe simply replacing the ball and trunion with a slip joint would be possible without changing the main shaft of the transmission.  It appears the splines on the ball and trunion style shaft are much shorter than the later models which my explain why the driveshaft shops like to put the slip yoke at the rear of the driveshaft. However, if you were rebuilding an 833 it would be a simple job to swap out the main shaft with a later model unit which would make the front slip yoke possible.  As for me, when I get my '64 Polara in the shop I'll just rebuild the ball and trunion unit. If it held up behind Max Wedge and early Hemi cars, its good enough for me.

On Tuesday, January 7, 2014 12:00:07 PM UTC-6, Bill Parker wrote:
I've been wondering about these points myself after reading the reasoning for the rear slip yoke at that link.  I don't think I've ever had or seen a torqueflite tailshaft housing crack in all these decades of messing with Mopars so that doesn't ring very credible.  I'm sure it isn't impossible, maybe Roland will have some additional insight on this.  The possible downside it seems to me of having the slip yoke in the rear, is that it is now way out there at the end of the shaft, so after the wear to the slip yoke and the dings and arrows to the tube of a few years of driving (as in typical 4 wheel drive shafts with a few years of service), would this placement exacerbate any wobble?  I do see the attractiveness of using this to make it a bolt in replacement.  If a regular slip yoke works on a tail shaft which originally had a B&T setup, one could simply come up with a complete used Mopar shaft of an appropriate length, unbolt the B&T flange, and use the late model shaft, skipping the expensive modified shaft; I don't think this is the case though I haven't ever tried it.
 
Bill & Kathi Parker, South Central Indiana, harboring of bunch of old and newer Mopars

--
--
--
Please address private email -- email of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car transactions and negotiations, as well as other personal messages, only to the intended recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send your email to everyone using the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public email address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine-tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
 
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 1962to1965mopars+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.