RE: 64 Plymouths

Its not gna be a race car so what is the advantage of the wieand, it’s a single plane. Wont I lose bottom end?

From: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gary Pavlovich
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 1:00 PM
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 64 Plymouths

Bill,

If you build a Stroker Poly you can run a single four and make 400+HP and 450Torque; a little more can be had with the dual quad but then your carb cost is also doubled – the single four would perform well but I would suggest using a Weiand 7503 intake with ported heads. The cast iron four is good but I would do some intake manifold porting to maximize the flow with ported Poly heads; although it will be good without doing so, just better with the enlarged ports.

Let me know if you need any other information to help make your decision.

Gary P.

From: Bill Paxton

Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 4:23 AM

To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: 64 Plymouths

Cool. You run the dual quads Correct? How many cubes? I’m planning my rebuild and want to find out if it is worth the extra money to build a stroker and run a single carb.

From: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Kinsley
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 1:00 AM
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 64 Plymouths

I had a best of 9.15 in the 1/8th which would theoretically be about 14.36 in the 1/4. My previous best on my 264 cam set-up with stock heads was 9.75. I only had 6 runs on the new 284 cam set-up and the last 3 were with a broken tailshaft housing. I also had not done any tuning yet as I use the runs to adjust the tune and I need some baseline to start with. I was basically just getting my baseline numbers when I broke. I am positive I would be capable of breaking into the high 8's if I pursued it further. I feel I have accomplished enough of my goals at this time. The Challenger SRT8 that I had raced turned a 9.12 so I would be right with him now. Time is an issue so I am going to work on my next goal of turning LeRoar into a comfy cruiser and i want to hit the mid 20's in mpg. I feel that there is more to mpg than money savings. I am also interested in distance on a tank. I'm sure the folks in the northeast wish they could go farther/longer on a tank of gas! It makes for a comfort zone in the middle of the night or when out in the boonies on a Sunday.

Rich Kinsley '64 Dodge Polara LeRoar 4dr 324 poly w/goodies

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Bill Paxton <wmp4@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Do you know how fast your car will run the ¼?

From: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Kinsley
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 8:52 AM
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 64 Plymouths

There were some very fast candy striped Dodge s-wagons running back then. I think it was some from the Ramchargers.

Rich Kinsley '64 Dodge Polara LeRoar 4dr 324 poly w/goodies

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:44 AM, <dcdriver@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Carl,I didn't say that the 4 doors or wagons beat the 2 doors.. lol I just said that they not all mind you were faster usually the 4 doors and wagons were never seen again when the light changed. My 1sy car was a 55 Chebby,never got to run against any Mopars but I sure beat alot of Ferds.2nd car was a Ferd and we won't talk about that one.3rd car was a brand spankin new 69 Super Bee and I've owned Mopars ever since,even had a lil 64 Fury with a stage 3 wedge that kicked some tail.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Carl Sing <hemi64fury@xxxxxxxxx>
To: 1962to1965mopars <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tue, Nov 20, 2012 2:43 am
Subject: Re: 64 Plymouths

What are you smoking,from a gezer that was there

I drove a max wedge then and never got smoked by any 4 dr.

--- On Mon, 11/19/12, dcdriver@xxxxxxx <dcdriver@xxxxxxx> wrote:

From: dcdriver@xxxxxxx <dcdriver@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 64 Plymouths
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Monday, November 19, 2012, 9:25 PM

WHEN I was young,the 4 doors and wagons were usually faster cuz the owners OR drivers {if the cars were owned by a parent} usually lipped off to the 2door owners about how slow their cars were compared to the wagons an 4 doors! :-)

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: furyus63 <furyus63@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: 1962to1965mopars <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 3:47 pm
Subject: Re: 64 Plymouths

Dodger,

1. You've been hanging around Rich K. to long.

2. If this was true Gary H. would have this posted in Technical Ramblings..

3. The fact of the matter is that Wagons are the fastest...

Nick Tiberio

FuryUs63

From: Dodger7998@xxxxxxx
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 2:15:39 PM
Subject: Re: 64 Plymouths

You know that it is a scientific fact that the 4 drs. are faster than the 2 dr. cars,,,,,,,,,

--
--
--
Please address private email -- email of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car transactions and negotiations, as well as other personal messages, only to the intended recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send your email to everyone using the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public email address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine-tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.

--
--
--
Please address private email -- email of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car transactions and negotiations, as well as other personal messages, only to the intended recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send your email to everyone using the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public email address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine-tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.

--
--
--
Please address private email -- email of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car transactions and negotiations, as well as other personal messages, only to the intended recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send your email to everyone using the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public email address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine-tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.

--
Rich Kinsley '64 Dodge Polara 4dr 318poly w/goodies