Re: off topic subject matter

["David Oldfield" <doldfiel@xxxxxxxxx>]

David Oldfield

-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Futrell <gary.futrell@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 20:30:41 
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: off topic subject matter

I don't post very often anymore , but I'd hate to lose your input too,
Jimmy. I still read all the posts. Sounds like reading the Google
group page might be an option. No offense, but I can't see how anyone
could make it on dial-up anymore in 2012. Pretty much like driving a
Model T on a packed turnpike. I live in the country with no options of
phone company or cable internet. I use line of sight local broadband
internet, but have used an aircard and satellite internet where I'm
at.


  Gary F.

On 3/7/12, Eric R <hoodoovoodooray@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I access them from the website too.   I wonder if there's an option
> that clears all the extra previous message when we are replying that
> Gary can enable?
>
> On Mar 7, 9:13 pm, "Paul L.
> http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/ml-lennemann63.html";
> <pjl...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Jimmy, you have the option of reading the posts from the Google
>> website.  I'm thinking that would speed things up for you.  Is that
>> right Gary?  We'd hate to lose your input.  I have always accessed
>> from the website even in the Topica days.
>>
>> Paul L.
>>
>> On Mar 7, 6:39 pm, Jimmy Peavy <peave...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > The only options that I'm aware of, is for everyone on the list to
>> > follow the mail list guidelines as outlined by the administrator, Mr.
>> > Gary Hamel.
>> > I've erred I think by saying that his  guidelines are  really optional.
>> > Guidelines dictating mandatory 62 to 65 topics, and replying off list to
>> > other members when applicable.
>> > That would make life much more simple.
>> > It would sure make me happier, and I know that I'm not alone.
>>
>> >     Jimmy
>>
>> > On 3/7/2012 6:25 PM, MO wrote:
>>
>> > >   Isn't there options as to how we recieve 63-65 post's?  Jost
>> > > wondering if there is a better way for dial up guys to get the
>> > > messages without all the repeat stuff, I have had dial up and I
>> > > sympathize .....................MO
>>
>> > > On Mar 7, 4:25 pm, D J<djohn14...@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>> > >> Jimmy,
>> > >> reasonable request, remember old timer's of the group. That is one
>> > >> reason we lost Don Dulmage from the group. He had dial up and it took
>> > >> to long to get all his messages.
>> > >> I was interested in Herb's car and emailed him directly, he responded
>> > >> promply and with pictures. Also remember that some of us lost souls
>> > >> live out in God's county and are not able to get anything but dial
>> > >> up.
>> > >> I guess I'm just asking for all of us to try and be more
>> > >> understanding of other members request. jm2cw.
>>
>> > >> DJ
>>
>> > >> ________________________________
>> > >> I don't want to hurt anybody's feelings, and i don't want to be
>> > >> accused of taking a "hard line" again  against anyone, because I'm
>> > >> not doing either.
>> > >> But as many times as I've asked, it seems there is always someone
>> > >> that continues to ignore my pleas.
>> > >> I guess I'm going to have to eventually unsubscribe from the group,
>> > >> as it is just taking too long to access any of my mail. So far it has
>> > >> taken me 58 minutes to access my mail. Not just my 62 to 65 mail, but
>> > >> all of my mail .
>> > >> Please guys, I don't want to leave, but it looks like that is the
>> > >> only thing I haven't tried.
>>
>> > >>     Jimmy- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> --
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
> signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
> http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
>

-- 
--
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.

-- 
--
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.