Re: Hagerty vs Grundy vs Heacock vs ???

[Joseph Bitterman <furyrestored@xxxxxxxxx>]

i have grundy on all 3 of my old mopars and have had them for years, i only pay aprox 300 a year for 3 cars  i love the unlimited mileage i drive my cars.I was hit by  a crackhead in 08 in my fury and it did 9000 in damage grundy was at the body shop the next day and told the shop owner fix it and fix it right no matter the cost! i also had my valiant with a crack in the windshield and they paid for that replacement which was about 500 bucks my buddy had his barracuda parked on a hill nd the gas ran out and ate the paint off the 1/4 and they paid him for a new paintjob all they ask is that you keep the car in a garage and that it is not your primary transportation they even tell you to take the car to work occasionally drive it it is also good for a cross country run my brother in law has one of the others ins coompany's but can only drive so many miles and cannot be to far from his home he is switching to grundy, and it is agreed upon coverage if my
 fury gets stole or totaled they will cut me a check for 20k no questions asked i dont know how any body else could do a better job insuring old classic cars i have had 2 claims with them and both were handled very professionaly and quickly def 2 thumbs up

--- On Wed, 2/16/11, Tom Watters <tomwatters@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Tom Watters <tomwatters@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Hagerty vs Grundy vs Heacock vs ???
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wednesday, February 16, 2011, 10:33 AM
> I've been happy with Hagerty on my
> Dart.  Never had a claim, used the 
> towing once.  At $125/year for the Dart cant shake a
> stick at it.  
> Hagerty has never really even asked about mileage.
> 
> The only thing, like Dan said, I tried to add my 77
> ramcharger, and they 
> wouldnt take it, cuz it wasnt pretty enough.  They
> said if it was 
> restored, they would insure it.
> 
> I have a friend with an A100 as well.  I think he uses
> Grundy and is 
> happy with it.
> 
> --Tom
> 
> On 2/16/2011 7:30 AM, Dan McCormack wrote:
> > They're both good companies Bill. I was with Hagerty
> for years until I bought an A-100 van and they didn't want
> to take it. Grundy agreed to insure the van so I switched
> everything over to them. I no longer have the van so I was
> going to switch back to Hagerty but it turns out Grundy was
> a little cheaper. Grundy has unlimited mileage, I'm not sure
> if Hagerty does or not. Whoever you go with make sure it's
> an AGREED VALUE policy not Stated Value.
> > BTW I sold the van to a good friend of mine and he has
> it insured with guess who! Hagerty. I guess they woke up to
> the fact that old vans are collectable.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bill [mailto:Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:14 AM
> > To: mml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> 62-65 Mopar List
> > Subject: Hagerty vs Grundy vs Heacock vs ???
> >
> >
> > Anyone have anything good, bad, or indifferent to say
> about these
> > classic car insurers, or another competitor?
> >
> > I'm hunting for another company as JC Taylor is
> ticking me off and
> > would like some input on experiences.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Bill M
> > 65 Coronet 500 'vert http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo62008.html
> > 73 Dart Sport, 00 Cherokee Sport, 05 Ram 2500 CTD,
> 4WD, QC, LB, Laramie
> > 21 Model T Depot Hack, 92 Accord, 06 Mazda 3
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send
> parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other
> personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your
> privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
> content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> >
> > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> >
> >
> >
> 
>