Bill...no offense intended. I was just chuckling at your accidental spelling of "tranny", as "tyranny". Sometimes trannys do exhibit tyranny!! :-)
Darwin/BC Canada '67 Dart GT 'vert - 273/904 http://s41.photobucket.com/albums/e285/65val/----- Original Message ----- From: "William Harrison" <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "65" <65val@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 7:05 AM Subject: Re: Gear Head Question
Dyslexia kicking in or tunnel vision.....Hard to relax with my women at war presently. Wife and daughter....If no one on the list has a wife and daughter you won't understand...Later Bill Harrison 65 Coronet 2 dr postP. S Didn't know about the AMC torqueflite use untill I picked up a 70 BB transmission and found a Motors manual that included the information in the torqueflite repair section.--- On Fri, 11/19/10, 65 <65val@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:From: 65 <65val@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Gear Head Question To: bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx Date: Friday, November 19, 2010, 11:54 PM Nope...Relax....just the way you spelled "trannys"....tyrannys Darwin/BC Canada '67 Dart GT 'vert - 273/904 http://s41.photobucket.com/albums/e285/65val/> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "William Harrison" <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx>> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 5:22 PM > Subject: Re: Gear Head Question > > > So you think it is funny that AMC used Mopar innards in their > "transmissions"? Or don't you believe AMC used those parts? > Or should I have used Chrysler instead of Mopar? > If you need verification of AMC's use of "Chrysler" parts, just go to a > Motors repair manual for the 60's, 70's and go to the Transmission repair > section. > > > --- On Fri, 11/19/10, 65 <65Val@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> From: 65 <65Val@xxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: Re: Gear Head Question >> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx >> Date: Friday, November 19, 2010, 6:27 PM >> >> ""Mopar tyranny's"" >> >> >> LOL!! >> >> >> Darwin/BC/Canada >> --'67 Dart GT 'vert... >> http://s41.photobucket.com/albums/e285/65val >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "William Harrison" >> <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx> >> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 8:20 AM >> Subject: RE: Gear Head Question >> >> >> Everyone should understand that AMC used Mopar tyranny's >> and many other Mopar parts. They were like the Kansans City >> Royals to the NY Yankees in the 60's and 70's. They were >> thought derisively called a farm team for the Yankees. >> Later >> Bill Harrison >> 65 Coronet 2 dr post >> >> --- On Fri, 11/19/10, Rich Kinsley <rlkinsley@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> > From: Rich Kinsley <rlkinsley@xxxxxxxxx> >> > Subject: RE: Gear Head Question >> > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx >> > Date: Friday, November 19, 2010, 8:56 AM >> > >> > Ollie wrote: >> > > >> > > The harmonic balancer is on a 1966 AMC 199 ci./ >> 232 >> > ci. Part # covers >> > > 1964-1974. Not available, at a reasonable price. >> I can >> > get one that >> > > covers >> > > Jeep1972-1978, 232 ci at a reasonable price. All >> the >> > dimensions are the >> > > same, the repair kit is the same part #. So what >> is >> > the difference? All >> > > I >> > > can think of is the timing mark placement? >> > > Ollie >> > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gary >> Pavlovich" <glpavlovich@xxxxxxx> >> > > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > > Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 4:46 PM >> > > Subject: Re: Gear Head Question >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > I have a good used harmonic balancer from a >> 318 >> > Poly if you need one; >> > > > $15 >> > > > plus shpg. Same as the LA >> > balancer. >> > > > Pictures available. >> > > > >> > > > Gary >> > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: >> "Ollie" <satellite1965@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > > > To: "Mopar Club" <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > > > Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 2:03 PM >> > > > Subject: Gear Head Question >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> I need a harmonic balancer. The year >> vehicle >> > I need is not available. I >> > > >> can get one that uses the same rebuild >> kit #, >> > shows the same >> > > >> dimensions. >> > > >> To me it would work. The only thing I >> can >> > think of is the timing marks >> > > >> would be off. No big deal, I can paint >> on the >> > proper ones before >> > > >> installing. Am I correct? >> > > >> >> > > >> Please shed light on my dilemma >> > > >> >> > > >> Ollie >> > > >> [Non-text portions of this message have >> been >> > removed] >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> ---- >> > > >> Please address private mail -- mail of >> > interest to only one person -- > >> directly >> to that person. I.e., send >> > parts/car transactions and >> > > >> negotiations as well as other personal >> > messages only to the intended >> > > >> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public >> > address. This practice will >> > > >> protect your privacy, reduce the total >> volume >> > of mail and fine tune the >> > > >> content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! >> > > >> >> > > >> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion >> > Guidelines: >> > > >> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and >> > >> > > >> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > ---- >> > > > Please address private mail -- mail of >> interest >> > to only one person -- > > directly to that >> person. I.e., send >> > parts/car transactions and >> > > > negotiations as well as other personal >> messages >> > only to the intended >> > > > recipient, not to the Clubhouse public >> address. >> > This practice will >> > > > protect >> > > > your privacy, reduce the total volume of >> mail and >> > fine tune the content >> > > > signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! >> > > > >> > > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion >> > Guidelines: >> > > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> =================================================================== >> > >> > Put a Hemi balancer on it and you'll gain 300hp :-) >> > >> > Rich Kinsley '64 Dodge Polara 4dr 318poly w/goodies >> > http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/ml-kinsley64polara.html >> > >> > >> > ---- >> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to >> only one >> > person -- directly to that person. I.e., send >> > parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as >> other >> > personal messages only to the intended recipient, not >> to the >> > Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect >> your >> > privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune >> the >> > content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! >> > >> > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: >> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and >> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> ---- >> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one >> person -- directly to that person. I.e., send >> parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other >> personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the >> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your >> privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the >> content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! >> >> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: >> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and >> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. >> >> >> >
---- Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.