It's the real deal, I have seen it . It's rare In a message dated 4/19/2010 2:30:27 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx writes: I worked with steel products for 30 years and it doesn't look like aluminum. It looks like stainless but I question if it is 17 pounds. Stainless is lighter, but not that much lighter. Later Bill --- On Mon, 4/19/10, Dave64 <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Dave64 <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: HOLY $#@& > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 2:24 PM > That weight sounds more like > aluminum. > > --- On Mon, 4/19/10, Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > From: Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: HOLY $#@& > > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > > Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 1:17 PM > > > > and would stainless steel be THAT much lighter so that > it > > weighs only > > 17 pounds? That doesn't really make sense to me. > > > > -- > > Bill M > > 65 Coronet 500 'vert http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo62008.html > > 73 Dart Sport, 00 Cherokee Sport, 01 Dakota SLT > > 21 Model T Depot Hack, 92 Accord, 06 Mazda 3 > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:15 PM, William Harrison > <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > Man on Man is he ever proud of this piece..With > no > > documentation is it worth what he is asking and with > > documentation is it worth what he is asking. > > > Even if I had a spare 15 grand, I wouldn't buy > it, I > > would have one made. > > > > > > Bill Harrison > > > 65 Coronet 2 dr post > > > > > > --- On Mon, 4/19/10, Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > >> From: Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx> > > >> Subject: HOLY $#@& > > >> To: > > >> Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 11:57 AM > > >> > > >> http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1965-426-Race-Hemi-Factory-Altered-Wheel-Base-K-Frame_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQhashZitem4395825ecdQQitemZ290271157965QQp tZMotorsQ5fCarQ5fTruckQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories > > >> > > > > > > ---- > > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to > only one > > person -- directly to that person. I.e., send > > parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as > other > > personal messages only to the intended recipient, not > to the > > Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect > your > > privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune > the > > content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! > > > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. > > > > > > > > > > -- [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ---- Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.