Re: HOLY $#@&
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: HOLY $#@&




It's the real deal, I have seen it . It's rare
 
 
In a message dated 4/19/2010 2:30:27 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx writes:

I worked  with steel products for 30 years and it doesn't look like 
aluminum. It looks  like stainless but I question if it is 17 pounds.
Stainless is lighter, but  not that much lighter.
Later
Bill


--- On Mon, 4/19/10, Dave64  <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Dave64  <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: HOLY $#@&
> To:  1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 2:24  PM
> That weight sounds more like
> aluminum.
> 
> ---  On Mon, 4/19/10, Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>  
> > From: Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject:  Re: HOLY $#@&
> > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> >  Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 1:17 PM
> > 
> > and would  stainless steel be THAT much lighter so that
> it
> > weighs  only
> > 17 pounds? That doesn't really make sense to me.
>  > 
> > -- 
> > Bill M
> > 65 Coronet 500 'vert  http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo62008.html
> > 73 Dart Sport,  00 Cherokee Sport, 01 Dakota SLT
> > 21 Model T Depot Hack, 92  Accord, 06 Mazda 3
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, Apr 19,  2010 at 2:15 PM, William Harrison
> <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx>
> >  wrote:
> > > Man on Man is he ever proud of this  piece..With
> no
> > documentation is it worth what he is  asking and with
> > documentation is it worth what he is  asking.
> > > Even if I had a spare 15 grand, I wouldn't  buy
> it, I
> > would have one made.
> > >
>  > > Bill Harrison
> > > 65 Coronet 2 dr post
> >  >
> > > --- On Mon, 4/19/10, Bill  <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > >
>  > >> From: Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >>  Subject: HOLY $#@&
> > >> To:
> > >> Date:  Monday, April 19, 2010, 11:57 AM
> > >>
> > >>  
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1965-426-Race-Hemi-Factory-Altered-Wheel-Base-K-Frame_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQhashZitem4395825ecdQQitemZ290271157965QQp
tZMotorsQ5fCarQ5fTruckQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories
>  > >>
> > 
> > 
> > ----
> >  Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one
>  > person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send
> >  parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as
> other
> >  personal messages only to the intended recipient, not
> to the
>  > Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
> your
>  > privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune
>  the
> > content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> >  
> > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> >  http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> >  http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> >  
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. 













Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.