Re: Trans Question

[Jimmy Peavy <peaver63@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I've seen them, but it was a long time ago.
I do remember that they were unusable because of the out-put housing/shaft.
Everything else is good for parts.

Bill wrote:
> What type of tailstock would a 65 Imperial w/ a 2-piece drive shaft
> have that's not a slip yoke and not a ball & trunion? I got offered an
> 85K mile running 413 w/ trans for $100 (don't know what the hell I'm
> gonna do with it but I'm DEFINITELY buying it) and he said the trans
> has a u-joint basically right on the tail stock. I have not seen it
> and I wouldn't know a ball & trunion setup if I tripped over one. Any
> thoughts?
>
>   


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.