One other thing is I have heard some grumbling that the SS springs of today are not as good of quality as in the past. My springs settled more than I had expected also, but not as bad as what was on it when I got it! It was suggested on another site to get a set of adjustable coil over shocks to assist the SS springs? Herb 1956 Plymouth Belvedere 361 1959 Coronet 326 Poly 1963 Fury 2D/HT 6.1 1963 Sport Fury Convertible 361 1970 Challenger RT 440 - 4 Sale 1999 Durango SLT 5.9 2008 SRT-8 Magnum 6.1 St. Louis, MO. http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo42009.html -------Original Message------- From: Paul Lennemann Date: 3/13/2010 8:21:57 AM To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: SS Spring thing O.K. I think Herb has cleared it up. If I made a mistake it was probably buying spring with a too light rating 3400# rather than say 3800#. Thanks Herb. Paul L. '63 Sport Fury 440/727 http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/ml-lennemann63.html Herb wrote: > > > 62-63 used 2in shorter springs than 64-65s did or a 20 in distance from > pin > to bushing. That is why 4s & 5s that use a 22 in distance, need the > spacer > to compensate for the shorter spring length between the dowel or axle > center > & center of the front spring bushing to make the SS springs work. As MO > stated less spring wrap up in front of the axle makes better pinion > geometry > I used the 3800lb on my 63 and of-course no spacers. >           > Herb > > 1956 Plymouth Belvedere 361 > 1959 Coronet 326 Poly > 1963 Fury 2D/HT 6.1 > 1963 Sport Fury Convertible 361 > 1970 Challenger RT 440 - 4 Sale > 1999 Durango SLT 5.9 > 2008 SRT-8 Magnum 6.1 > St. Louis, MO. > > http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo42009.html > > > > > -------Original Message------- > > From: Paul Lennemann > Date: 3/13/2010 6:53:37 AM > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: SS Spring thing > > I'll measure from the center of the axle tube to the center of the front > mounting hole. > > Paul L. > '63 Sport Fury > 440/727 > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/ml-lennemann63.html > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ---- Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www 1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ---- Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. This email was sent to: arc.6265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx u/?bUrDWg.bSONJP.YXJjLjYy ?p=TEXFOOTER