Re: Ball and Trunnion vs. Slip spline - was RE: disc brakes - caution...

[Gary <mopar413@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Use to buy the boot for a VW and made that work.  It bolts together.
---- Mike and Linda Andrusiewicz <miclinmopar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> 
> Just curious....
> 
> I've got a 65 Barracuda with a torn boot (OK....its actually missing at this 
> point!) over the B/T joint.
> 
> I "heard" that there are 2 piece boots and a aftermarket boot (motorcycle 
> part or CV joint?)  that will slide over the B/T joint without taking it 
> apart.  The joint is good, but the boot is bad.
> 
> Can someone point me to a inexpensive boot option??
> 
> Thanks
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Steven Charette" <stevec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 2:35 PM
> Subject: Ball and Trunnion vs. Slip spline - was RE: disc brakes - 
> caution...
> 
> 
> >
> > Merwin,
> > My opinion is that the much-maligned ball and trunnion is a viable
> > joint when in good condition.  Once they are worn or broken, you have to
> > make the decision to swap or repair.
> >
> > At the risk of repeating myself, the B&T was used by high-end auto
> > manufacturers (Rolls, Bentley, etc) back in the 60's, and the same style
> > joint was used in helicopters of the day as well.  It's a very robust 
> > joint.
> > Repair parts, while not cheap, are available.
> >
> > Once again, my $.02 only - if you have a street car/cruiser/Saturday
> > Night Special that you romp on once in a while, the B&T is probably fine, 
> > if
> > it's not clunking, clattering, or exposed to the elements (missing/torn
> > boot).  If you have a sticky tired boulevard brawler or drag car that 
> > spends
> > a lot of time on just the rear wheels, you might want to move toward the
> > more conventional cross type u-joint when the B&T begins showing signs of
> > wear.
> >
> > The '64 "Color Me Gone" car at the Chrysler Museum was cloned from
> > the old "Suspect 426" car that spent it's life in mid-Michigan.  The car 
> > was
> > a race car from day one.  I had the opportunity to drive the car in the 
> > 80's
> > - it ran low 11's at over 125mph, with the OE driveshaft.  The car was 
> > kinda
> > weird to drive - it had full upholstery and I always equated it with 
> > racing
> > my mom's car.  It was relatively quiet and smooth as silk, unlike my '63
> > that vibrated like crazy in high gear (needed a transmission mount, but
> > that's another story).  It was raced that way up until it became the 
> > "Color
> > Me Gone" car in the late 90's, and I'm guessing if you crawled under it
> > today, the same shaft is still there.
> >
> > You would need a slip-spline transmission (or tailshaft and housing
> > if you're rebuilding) to make the swap.  If the car were mine, I'd hold 
> > onto
> > the slip spline stuff until you need it.
> >
> > SC
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Merwin Wrisley [mailto:vulcan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 8:06 PM
> > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: disc brakes - caution, another long read with part numbers 
> > and
> > prices
> >
> >
> > No offense taken, never turn down a chance to learn something new!!
> >    While I've got your ear, my 65 Coronet 4-speed has the trunnion/ball
> > driveshaft. I also have a 'shaft from a '65  727 car with the slip joint
> > yoke. Will they interchange,and which is stronger? Thanks for all your
> > imput,  Warren
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --  
> > directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and 
> > negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended 
> > recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect 
> > your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content 
> > signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> >
> > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and 
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. 
> 
> 


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.