
Re: 426
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 426
- From: fmichael graham <intiaboats@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 16:39:17 -0800 (PST)
It depends on the year(s).
The 2432230 block(1964-66) was used for both the Wedge and Max. Perf. Wedge, as was casting 2406730(1963-65). But, in each case, were they used for each application simultaneously?
Mike
--- On Sun, 11/1/09, Harry skalla <moweepea@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Harry skalla <moweepea@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: 426
> To: "1962 1965" <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Received: Sunday, November 1, 2009, 2:46 PM
>
> maybe I didn't state this properly, I was talking about a
> 426 wedge as opposed to a 426 max wedge wedge block. Sorry
> for that....
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
> person -- directly to that person. I.e., send
> parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other
> personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your
> privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
> content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
>
>
>
__________________________________________________________________
Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!
http://www.flickr.com/gift/
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network