RE: Cash for clunker cars

[62pluckedchicken@xxxxxxxxx]

you are on the mark... as one white house environmentalist said "we've' 
accelerated the natural turn-over of the American fleet to more fuel 
efficient, environmentally friendly cars".. 
what BS.. 
as pointed out by others here the impact these car make on fuel and the 
environment is so minuscule it can barely be measured

Plus look for round 2 of the recession.. people who had not thought of 
buying a car and participated in CARS, went from 0 payments a month to 
several hundred a month.. no more spending in their future, hence no new 
money flowing into the economy...

look for more non-Detroit related businesses to go under, more jobs lost

a short-sighted bill on so many fronts
Dave Cornelius wrote:
> 
> This is the same thing I've heard from multiple sources.  This program 
> disg=
> usts and offends me as an automobile lover - even if the cars aren't 
> "class=
> ics".  It's terribly wasteful, and I don't see the sense in it 
> economically=
> .  Guys like us can keep these cars in service much cheaper than by 
> buying =
> a new vehicle - no matter how much difference there is in fuel economy.  
> By=
>  destroying them, they not only lower the population of these autos, but 
>  th=
> ey deplete the usable parts available to keep the ones that are left in 
> ope=
> ration.  When a guy I work with told me his 2003 minivan qualifies for 
> this=
>  program, I figure there is something really wrong going on.  I also 
>  think =
> this program is encouraging the purchase of new cars by people who may 
> not =
> have been looking to buy a new car - most likely through credit.  Isn't 
> tha=
> t the root of the economic mess we're presently in in the first place - 
> too=
>  much debt?!  At the risk of sounding radical, I suggest that this
>  is an somewhat veiled attempt by some politicians at pushing their 
>  environ=
> mental Nazi agenda on all of us.  (Disclaimer:  I'm an independent and 
> not =
> anti-environment.)  To me this is typical Washington short sightedness - 
> an=
> d most of all - wastefulness.  What - we don't live in throw-away 
> society e=
> nough as it is already - that we have to crush perfectly good 
> automobiles n=
> ow?  Okay, I'm done preaching to the choir.  If you aren't in the choir 
> - n=
> o offense intended.
> 
> Dave
> 
> 
> --- On Sat, 8/15/09, Ollie <satellite1965@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > From: Ollie <satellite1965@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Cash for clunker cars
> > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Saturday, August 15, 2009, 7:06 PM
> >=20
> > Had a local car show today and learned a interesting bit of
> > info from a buddy of mine. I have no reason to doubt it.
> > ....BUT..in a court of law it would be "hear-say"
> > All cars traded in on the program must have all the oil
> > drained...a pint of liquid glass put in....car started until
> > the engine freezes up.....
> > Also cars must secured in a locked yard so nothing can be
> > removed or tampered with...until there final death at the
> > crusher....
> > Ollie
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Mopar" 
> > <dodgepolara500@xxxxxxxxx=
> >
> > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 4:31 PM
> > Subject: Re: MCG-Dealer Debacle Article
> >=20
> >=20
> > I think you need to repost the link
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Tom Duross <tduross1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: Mml <mml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> > 1962to1965mopars <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 10:49:43 AM
> > Subject: MCG-Dealer Debacle Article
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > Has anyone read this?
> > Pretty shocking
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >=20
> >=20
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
> > person --=A0 directly to that person. I.e., send
> > parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other
> > personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
> > Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your
> > privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
> > content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
> >=20
> > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
> >=20
> >=20
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
> > person -- directly to that person.=A0 I.e., send
> > parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other
> > personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
> > Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your
> > privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
> > content signal to Mopar topic.=A0 Thanks!
> >=20
> > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > =0A=0A=0A      


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.