SV: 1962 Plymouth - 361 or 360?

[Knud-Erik Holm <kebh@xxxxx>]

I want the one with the best power, to my 4-speed man trans.
I will use the parts I have at hand, and what I can find for small money. I
have already sunk more than 10000 usd. In the car (incl.car purchase) some
will come in again when I sell the parts I don't need.
However I need to stop the money from flying out of my pants for the moment.
And then the issue, of balancing the flywheel or not? with the crankshaft or
not?

I am bying parts in USA, Denmark and Sweden.
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Gary Pavlovich [mailto:glpavlovich@xxxxxxx] 
Sendt: 23. juli 2008 20:41
Til: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Emne: Re: 1962 Plymouth - 361 or 360?


Gary H.,

Thank you for your feedback to Knud-erik.  I was not aware of his goals 
either.  My choice for the 360 was based on his distance and the 
cost/availability of parts shpg. overseas or parts availabililty in his 
area.

If the 360 he has needs HP mods and the 361 already has them, like a four 
barrel...then a simple "overhaul" of the 361 or doing enough to make it 
roadworthy is the way to go.

If both engines need HP mods then I would probably lean towards the 360 for 
simplicity and ease of maintenance...as outlined in my first e-mail.

Of course, if period correct originality is higher on the list than High 
Performance (yes, the 361 will have sufficient HP/Torque w/the four barrel 
as equipped stock) then I think the choice should be for the 361.

Perhaps Knud-erik can fill us in on the goals.

Take care,
Gary Pavlovich
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gary" <spigot2039@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 7:18 AM
Subject: Re: 1962 Plymouth - 361 or 360?


>
> Good points Gary.
>
> It is unclear to me if the goal of Knud-erik is high performance. If so, a

> hopped up 360 is a good choice. Mopar Action did a similar build on a 1962

> Plymouth using a 360 FI engine and were blown away with the results; they 
> loved it. To me that configuration is a modern street rod. (Note: no bow 
> tie 350 in sight!)
>
> On the other hand, the stock 361 with a 4bbl will provide provide plenty 
> of butt torque and move that Sport Fury effortlessly. 361 is a baby 383 in

> effect. Big block torque comes naturally. :) The heads can be reworked to 
> use unleaded. TTI headers will work well. The 361 car is period correct.
>
> Built right, either motor will be very reliable.
>
> Just my 2 pennies.
>
> I can't help him with finding a flywheel but maybe someone here can.
>
> Thanks,
> Gary H.
>
> -----Original Message-----
>>My opinion/suggestion is to build the 360 if you want Horsepower/Torque,
>>reliability; build the 361 if you want a challenge and uniqueness.
>>
>>Reasons why to build the 360;
>>
>>High Performance parts are easy to obtain and less expensive than a 361.
>>
>>There are many HP recipies where you can choose your performance level; 
>>ie.
>>4" Stroker crank with W-2 heads and roller cam will get you 500torque &
>>500HP.
>>
>>Any fellow Hot-Rodder or mechanic can work with you and help you maintain 
>>or
>>do mods without guesswork because of the 360's commonality and performance
>>record.
>>
>>Gary Pavlovich
>
>>>  -------Original Message-------
>>
>>>  ... which one is the best to use in the car, the 360 is apparently a
>>>  k-code, meaning very little to me. With casting #418496.2.360
>>>  Additionally the heads on the 360 can use unleaded, however I will need
>>to
>>>  get the flywheel balanced, I am looking for the best solution and not
>>>  necessary the most original one, the 361 is somewhat 100 kg more. But 
>>> has
>>>  more power, the heads need leaded gas though. And then I have some 
>>> magnum
>>>  exhaust manifolds for the 361. And only originals for the 360, I do not
>>>  think that I have enough knowledge to make the proper choice! I need to
>>make
>>>  a decision as I am about to by a flywheel either for the 360 or 361, by
>>the
>>>  way does any one have a flywheel for sale?
>>>
>>>  Knud-erik Holm


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.