
--On 08/08/2026 10:04 PM CDT Paul Rosenblum <polliwog383@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi AllanIs this the neutral safety switch for the 1964 300 ram k console shift?Paul R
On Saturday, August 8, 2026 at 9:08:44 AM UTC-7 Allan Pozdol wrote:I discovered this for myself after I removed my old switch and saw the difference.This was after I had made a large purchase of parts from RockAuto and hadn't got to it in time to return the earlier version.I have a new, never installed neutral safety switch if anyone if looking for one!AllanOn 08/08/2026 7:21 AM CDT 'James Douglas' via Chrysler 300 Club International <chrysler-300-cl...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Turn out Allen is correct. Two styles of switch. One for the consol shift and one for everything else. The auto store parts books don’t show it. The factory Master Parts Book does.
Live and learn.
James
From: Bob Merritt <b...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2026 02:51
To: James Douglas <j...@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: {Chrysler 300} Neutral Safety Switch problem...300K
Hi James;
I was not aware there were
two styles of neutral safety switches.
I have nothing helpful other than maybe
this page: http://www.chrysler300club.com/tech/trans/neutsafeswi.html
Bob
On 8/7/2026 7:06 PM, 'James Douglas' via Chrysler 300 Club International wrote:
Ok,
So, I take the Chrysler into a well-respected shop run by two older men. They rebuild the trans to my specifications. I run’s great.
About a week after I get it back, I note that it is leaking. After a few months of running, it I check the level and it is down a quart. It is leaking more than I thought.
So, I take it in yesterday and they called my late in the day and told me the switch is leaking through the top. This is not a surprise to me as we have a new converter pump and a new housing. I assume the pressure is spot on and the old switch failed.
They go into the thing this morning to put in the new switch; it is the later, c.1965 type, and it is longer. I have two cores; they all have the shorter ones. The transmission has the correct trans number the only thing I can think of is the comb is from a later one. The car was produced in the fall of 1963.
Can anyone shed light on this for me? I car when I got it has 97K miles on it with one owner. I took the pan off and changed the filter; it had been in there a long time. Other than that is it stock.
Anyone?
James
--
For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylang
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chrysler 300 Club International" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chrysler-300-club-int...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chrysler-300-club-international/CH2PR19MB34639F0C1FDDFAE275E6594193D12%40CH2PR19MB3463.namprd19.prod.outlook.com.--
For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylang
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chrysler 300 Club International" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chrysler-300-club-int...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.--
For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylang
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chrysler 300 Club International" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chrysler-300-club-international+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chrysler-300-club-international/88399828-a8df-4553-9c40-356474b8a771n%40googlegroups.com.