Hi all,
Following
up on Bob Jacinski's comment that "the white wall widths shown on the
website are not necessarily correct". Thank you Bob. I agree.
The '55-'56 width of a 3" white wall I believe is erroneous and have no idea where the information that
made that chart came from. I also have had communications from Mark Obermann and John Lazenby on this
topic a few months back as well.
I had old used tires from that period, long ago discarded, and never remember the '56 white walls being as wide as 3 inches.
I
think that the OEM tires provided on new cars in '56 were Goodyears
back then. I was fortunate to obtain a Goodyear whitewall tire that was
never out of the trunk from a '56 DeSoto. The whitewall measures 2-3/4 " wide
showing as I you can see accurately measured in the pictures. The only difference between
DeSoto and most Chryslers was the size being 7.60 vs 8.20. I
can't believe Goodyear would have any difference in white wall widths
between sizes so I believe that Chryslers would have had the same width
whitewall.
Pictures
taken from the 1956 Chrysler service manual also show a tire that in my
opinion looks to have a whitewall width less than 3" compared to the
overall tire sidewall. Clearly the tire pictured in the manual is a
Goodyear by virtue of the tread and sidewall pattern like the picture of
my DeSoto Goodyear.
Based
upon my documentation, I believe the WW width for '55-'56 to be 2-3/4 "
to be correct. When I ordered some Diamondback Classic radials many
years ago, I spoke with the owner and, because they could make the WW
width any size you wanted, specified that I wanted 2-3/4" 'showing'
after being mounted. I stated this because probably about 1/4 " sits
under the wheel rim after mounting so is not seen or showing..
The
tire on my '56 Desert Rose car is a BF Goodrich with 2-3/4" WW but is a
bias belt tire. The one on the '56 Mediterranean Blue is the Diamondback
radial I described above.
Again,
I don't know who made the chart on the website about tire whitewall
widths, but my opinion is it is not the gospel for correctness.
Maybe I'm too hung up on correctness, but so be it. Just my 50 cents.
Respectfully,
John Cote