RE: {Chrysler 300} Paint thoughts

[RON WATERS <ronbo97@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I thought the paint on Naif's car looked great. Actually what Tom White probably did was mix a little base color in with the clear. That gave it a single stage look. 

Auto body workers have a lot of leeway when painting a car. They can add a touch of orange peel by increasing the gun-to-body distance when spraying. Or they can do minimal buffing after spraying to cut down on the 'mile of gloss' look you see on Corvettes. Or no buffing at all. 

I would opt for a two stage paint, mainly because repairs (chips, mostly) are easier to repair. When I put my car back together after paint, I ended up with almost a dozen chips. The car went back to the shop for spot repair. There is no way of seeing them now. It was done with two stage base/clear. If the paint had been single stage, a full panel repaint may have been in order. 

Ron

> On 09/27/2021 10:39 AM Dan Plotkin <dplotkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>  
> I have single stage urethane (Glasurit) on my 61 Savoy. Clear on black looks too greasy on a early 60's car. My friend Naif Makol, former owner of the yellow/black 59 Dodge Super D 500 convertible he restored agonized over the sheen issue and faithful appearance. He mixed clear into the base was happy with that. (search Mecum for John Staluppi's 59 Dodge and check the photos).

-- 
For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylang
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chrysler 300 Club International" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chrysler-300-club-international+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chrysler-300-club-international/992295262.49229.1632757508830%40connect.xfinity.com.