Re: [Chrysler300] 58 300 block
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chrysler300] 58 300 block

I'm assuming that the heads he wants to use include the non-adjustable rocker arms that are used with hydraulic lifters.  The blocks are not different.  New hydraulic lifters and an appropriate cam can be installed in that block and pushrods for the New Yorker or Imperial engine can be also installed.
If there is an intent to use the camshaft for solid lifters, new solid lifters, and the non-adjustable rocker arms there are adjustable pushrods available to enable avoiding a change of rockers and rocker covers.  I've made that conversion on 2 engines somewhat recently.
------------------Marshall Goodknight

---------- Original Message ----------
From: "John Nowosacki jsnowosacki@xxxxxxxxx [Chrysler300]" <Chrysler300-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Chrysler300] 58 300 block
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 07:35:27 -0400


a friend has a 392 block that used to have solid lifters.  It has no heads now, and he wants to know if there is any problem with fitting heads that are hydraulic.
Any help appreciated.



Posted by: "mgoodknight@xxxxxxxx" <mgoodknight@xxxxxxxx>

To send a message to this group, send an email to:

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or
go to

For list server instructions, go to

For archives go to

Visit Your Group
Yahoo! Groups
PrivacyUnsubscribeTerms of Use


One Trick to Catch a Liar
The Beacon
SponsoredBy Content.Ad

Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network Archive Sitemap

Copyright 2018 The Forward Look Network.  All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.