Observations on content:
1) The last sentence for the first generation introduction section
(‘55-‘56) is a fragment, like a final thought may have been missing.
2) In the “300-H” section it is mentioned that the H had the “best
power to weight ratio of any of the letter cars.” While that was true up
until 1962, the Ram K was probably the actual best, followed closely and/or tied
by the J, based on advertised dry weights and the advertised horsepower.
In that same section it says that “1962 was the worst selling year for the
letter car.” Maybe on a calendar year basis (I don’t know), but on a
production basis it was actually it was the J in 1963.
3) In the fourth generation (‘63-‘64) introduction it states that the “the
convertible returned to the Letter Series for 1964 , but the 300-K was otherwise
identical to the 300-J.” That is most certainly not true. We 300
nuts are picky about details like that.
4) The features listed for 1967 were optional at extra cost and not
standard.
5) The 1970 section lists Hurst production at both 501 and 485.
There seems to be some leftover verbiage from an earlier rendition that need
editing.
6) In the ninth generation section (‘99-‘04) there is no mention of
the 300M Special (which actually was special in features and equipment).
Ninth and tenth generation sections seem incomplete. As our club does not
include these cars, should they be covered at all?
Some minor grammatical corrections and overall editing are still
required.
Carl B
From: Tony Rinaldi
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 12:34 PM
Subject: [Chrysler300] R7 Diamond Jubilee 300
Circus
__._,_.___ To send a message to this group, send an email to: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or go to http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join and select the "Leave Group" button For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylang __,_._,___ |