Tony, Thanks, that was interesting, I recall when it was last posted. Unfortunately, it is really anecdotal,even the part by the accident investigator. It seems to me that in order to make a judgement on the degree of danger in using rims designed when bias tires were the norm mounted with radial tires, more information is needed. IMHO we need either engineering studies showing the relative strengths and resistance to flex of the two types of rims, and/or a large sampling of numbers of bias rims using radial tires vs numbers of rim failures. The accident investigator probably has not investigated many of the types of accidents where old rims fail due to radial tires simply because their probably have not been many such accidents to investigate. Certainly most folks didn't keep their old cars long enough to be using radials on the older rims, bias ply tires were available for many years after radials became the OEM tire. Non-enthusiasts probably change cars every 5-10 years, don't have those stats and too lazy to look them up. Point is, if radials were on new cars in 1972-1973 for instance, by 1980, the large majority of people were probably driving cars that came with radials. Apparently radials became commonly available in the US in 1966 or so from after market sources. If they were causing rim failures, they probably would have soon withered away. Accident investigation was not what it is today, so we probably will never know for certain how many failures may have occurred in the early years of radials. http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/1832.html http://www.classiccar.com/articles/content/index.php?/archives/21-A-Tale-of-Two-Tires.html So, I think we have poor or no reliable statistics on this issue in the 60's and into the late 70's. By the early 80's I believe few people, other than those who could not afford newer cars, or old car nuts were driving those pre-radial cars. The poorer folks probably did not equip their cars with more the newer, more expensive radials when tire replacement was at hand. I think it is safe to assume that the pool of vehicles using bias ply rims with radial tires has been small since the 80s and has gotten quite small into the 90's and on. Although we have no real figures to go on, I think that the old car community is a close knit gene pool with many of us having more interests than 300s, I myself am on several message boards and have never actually heard of a rim failure attributed solely to using radial tires. I am afraid I have been using them myself for 25-30 years without problems. Does this prove anything? Not in and of itself, but if no one is really reporting a problem, and between us all we are exposed to a significant percentage of the old car community, that is a telling fact. Finally, for anyone who managed to get this far without falling asleep, I believe that any changes in rims were driven by vehicles increasing in HP and weight rather than tire type. For the life of me, I cannot fathom how a more flexible tire, which the radial is, can cause more flex in the rim. Seems like a stiffer tire would do that? For the road, I still wouldn't hesitate to continue using radials on my old cars. If I decide to go canyon carving or road racing, I will most certainly buy new, larger rims for that purpose. Ok, rant off. I do appreciate the efforts to educate us to possible danger, I just don't quite know if the information is factual in the sense that all other variables have been eliminated and a percentage of chance of failure assigned. After all, any tire, any rim, may fail at any time without prior notice. It is dissecting the failure and coming to a good conclusion that is missing here. Regards, Bill Huff At 8/15/200910:19 AM, Tony Rinaldi wrote: > > >Hi to all, > >As promised, I am attaching the text from an article in Old Cars Weekly. >Please do not kill the messenger! > >Tony Rinaldi > >__________________________________________________________ > >The following is reprinted from Old Cars Weekly from Sept 21, 2006 and warns >of the danger of wheel failure unless the rims are replaced by stronger ones >designed for use with radial tires. >__________________________________________________________ > >Q. Recently, I purchased five new wide whitewall radials from a reputable >tire company (one of your advertisers). The car for their intended use is a >1956 Mercury that previously had biasâ??ply tires. Although I had the new >radials professionally mounted and balanced, the front hubcaps come off >while driving, especially the left front on right turns. Can you advise me >if I need to replace the wheel rims with a heavier type? Robert W. Blume, >Sr., Calverton, N.Y. > >A. Back in 2003, we had a lively discussion of wheels intended for biasâ??ply >tires "throwing" hubcaps when mounted with radials. Here are readers' >comments from that discussion. "The problem of cars 'throwing hubcaps' is >much more serious than rim flex and lost hubcaps. Try losing your life with >this problem! Rims for bias-ply tires, radial-ply tires, even disc brake >rims are made out of different alloys. Rims for bias-ply tires cannot use >radials, and bias and simple radial-ply rims cannot be used for disc brakes.. >The forces exerted by bias-ply versus radial-ply tires (as well as disc >brakes) are different and need rims made specific to each application. When >using radial tires on bias-ply rims, the rims overâ??flex as they are unable >to handle the forces of the radial tires. This over-flexing also means metal >fatigue, breakage (most commonly rim bead edge separation), and deadly >accidents. Many will disagree, touting their successful usage of radial >tires on bias-ply rims, but as a fatal accident investigator, the first >place I looked in any older car accident was at the rims. My advice when >replacing bias tires with radials is to immediately change the rims. One can >tell bias, radial, and disc brake rims by their markings," wrote Sam Egan, >general manager, Automotive Information Clearinghouse, La Mesa, Calif. >Another reader wrote, "When you install a radial tire on an old rim and the >footprint of the tire is wider or equal to the rim bead, the twisting of the >sidewall puts undue stress on the lighter and original rim. We put radial >tires on our 1956 Ford and had the same problem. We cured the problem when >we switched to 1966 Ford rims, which are one inch wider and eight to nine >pounds heavier, which makes them stronger than the old rims." Paul Haase of >Waterloo, Iowa, also advised replacing the rims. "Then if the wheel discs >still slip, they can be held in place a bead of silicone." Sanford Danziger >recommended locating a set of alloy rims, which would obviate the hubcap >problem. To hold the wheel covers in place, assuming movement is still a >problem with the correct rims, Dan Reed says he secured the wheel covers for >his 1956 Cadillac with a strap that was secured by one of the lugnuts. He >found this idea on a 1958 Oldsmobile. The strap has to be long enough to >allow access to the lug nuts. "It won't prevent the wheel cover from coming >off, but will keep it from being lost," he wrote. Marilyn Robinson ended the >problem of wheel covers flying off their Plymouth Valiant by switching to >hubcaps. Terry Wallace of Pensacola, Fla., brushed some of the grit coating >used on surf and skateboards onto the rim area that the wheel covers >contact. The covers still wanted to walk on the rim, so he added a bead of >silicone and has had no further trouble. Bob Brooks of Suffield, Conn., >coated the wheel rim contact area on his 1952 Mercury with rubber cement and >hasn't thrown a wheel cover since. To hold the full disc, wheel covers on >his 1989 Thunderbird, Lou Frueh of Wickliffe, Ky., drilled a hole in the >wheel cover 180 degrees from the valve stem, then drilled and tapped a hole >in the wheel as near the rim as possible, and bolted on the wheel covers. He >disguised the bolt to look like another valve stem. Thomas Murray of San >Leandro, Calif., found that a strip of masking tape around the rim holds the >wheel covers on his two Kaisers in place. Bob Lewis of Susanville, Calif., >uses silicone adhesive sealant to keep the full disc wheel covers on his >1950 Ford club coupe from moving. Gerald White of Altoona, Fla., observed >that the brake drum will keep the center of the wheel from flexing, but not >the rim, leading us back to Mr. Egan's warning about the danger of wheel >failure unless the rims are replaced by stronger ones designed for use with >radial tires. > >From: Bob Jasinski <<mailto:rpjasin%40pacbell.net>rpjasin@xxxxxxxxxxx> >Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:00:44 -0700 >To: Chrysler 300 Club ><<mailto:Chrysler300%40yahoogroups.com>Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: [Chrysler300] Radial tires on Beautiful Brutes > >Tony, > >I took the subject as being all of our letter cars running radials. Having >said that, if you do have the information from the accident investigator and >it would be easy for you to email it, I would like to see the data. I do >forklift accident investigation work and I actually like reading reports >like you describe. > >Thanks! > >Bob J > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ To send a message to this group, send an email to: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:Chrysler300-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:Chrysler300-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/