[Chrysler300] Controversy
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Chrysler300] Controversy



Well here's my $.12 cents worth.  I feel as long as the basic Cabin is 
used its still a 300.   How many times would a car have to replace a 
whole front clip or a rear clip or both after a wreck.  That didn't make 
it a non 300 car.   I saw my Dad who had a frame and front end shop for 
40 years cut a front frame or rear frame off and weld in  a replacement 
from a wrecking yard.  It might not have came from a identical car . 
Just one that was the same. That didn't change the name or type of car.  
It was still what it was.    This was standard practice before the 
Unibodys came out.  and even then they did a lot of frame replacement.  
They either straightened the frame or replaced it.    I never saw him 
replace a whole frame,.   not saying it wasn't done. I believe they 
called those cars Totaled.   But if the main car body was retained it 
kept its Identify.


      Just Information to think about.   Gary Barker


To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network Archive Sitemap


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.