Re: [Chrysler300] Lake Tahoe controversy
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chrysler300] Lake Tahoe controversy



Just found the problem.  There is a box in "options" for spelling.  I had 
the box checked to ignore misspelled words in original text or forwarded 
text.  I had assumed that this would protect me from having spellcheck 
merely check my text, and ignore the misspelling in any text that I was 
replying to.  Not the case.  It also ignores misspelled words in the text 
that I enter in replying to or forwarding an email.  A distinction with a 
difference.

Roger Schaaf
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roger Schaaf" <obiwan10@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Lake Tahoe controversy


> Sorry for all the misspelled words in my last emails.  I do have 
> spellcheck turned on in my email client(Outlook Express), but seems to be 
> failing me now(does not even come up to do any checking--I became 
> suspicious as I know that my spelling/typing is often not that good and it 
> always came up to check before).  Suspect could be related to the 
> anti-spam software that I have installed. I have no excuse for sometimes 
> poor grammar except that I type faster then my old mind can think.  Until 
> I figure out spellcheck problem, I will do a better job of proofreading my 
> rants before broadcasting them.  If anyone has any ideas on spellcheck 
> failure to invoke on Outlook Express please post me.
>
> Thank you
> Roger Schaaf
>
> Roger Schaaf
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Roger Schaaf" <obiwan10@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <dan300f@xxxxxxx>; <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
> <john_nowosacki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Lake Tahoe controversy
>
>
>> Let us compare this to medical advances that are current and are to come.
>>
>> I would suggest that your brain could be compared to an automobiles VIN.
>>
>> If you were to replace virtually any of your physical body parts(except 
>> of course the brain) via either current or future technology, it would 
>> still be you, as long as your brain(where your soul--for the believers--  
>> and/or consciousness reside) then I argue that you are still you.
>>
>> The same could be said of the VIN.  As long as it is legitimate and is 
>> posted to a body/chassis that in all other regards would be identical to 
>> a "factory" 300 then it is a 300.  In particular, if the creator of this 
>> reconstituted 300 did it in absolute secrecy, who would be the wiser and 
>> how could this feat of alchemy be detected.
>>
>> Therefore should a charlatan who is able to do this magic anonymously be 
>> rewarded for his efforts beyond what a more open and candid restorer did 
>> in bringing back from the dead a VIN number from an otherwise destroyed 
>> and lost 300?  In simpler terms, how many of you have 300's parked in 
>> your garages that may have already enjoyed this resurrection and you or 
>> no one else is the wiser?
>>
>> Some of you are probably of an age where you remember the Dusenberg. 
>> Many times(most??) the chassis was built by the factory and the buyer 
>> then recruited a "coach builder" to build a body.  These were and are 
>> considered "real" Dusenbergs by all who follow this Marquee.  Often a 
>> later buyer or sometimes even the original owner would have a change of 
>> heart about the look of a Dusey they may own.  They then would re-body 
>> this chassis to another body, often by a different coach builder.
>>
>> I do not know for certain, but do suspect that these are accepted as real 
>> Duzzzie's and collectors of this Marque accept them as such.
>>
>> There were very few of our favorite vehicle produced, many were destroyed 
>> or lost over the years.  To see how many angels can dance on the head of 
>> a pin in search of correctness serves none of us well.  This is a hobby 
>> for many/most/all of us, not a business or investment.  That is why I 
>> have a Torqueflight in my B and now wishing(after Lake Tahoe) that I had 
>> done disc brakes last year when I replaced all my wheel cylinders.  Next 
>> time I will have disc brakes.  Someday a future obsessive owner can 
>> install a Powerflite and drum brakes.  Meanwhile no one is hurt and one 
>> more accurate B will remain for posterity.
>>
>> Roger Schaaf
>> Somewhat correct 300 B
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: <john_nowosacki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <dan300f@xxxxxxx>; <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 5:18 PM
>> Subject: RE: [Chrysler300] Lake Tahoe controversy
>>
>>
>>>I think the definition of 'clone' needs to be examined, too.
>>>
>>> The 'cloned' 440 six pack and 426 Hemi 'Cuda and Challenger cars I have 
>>> seen still retain their original 'N' code 383 VIN numbers.  Those are 
>>> clones.  They no longer match the configuration that left the factory on 
>>> the build date.
>>>
>>> What we are talking about here is an original car that needs extensive 
>>> metal replacement due to rust or accident, and will also retain its 
>>> original VIN, albeit one that matches the actual configuration of the 
>>> finished product as it left the factory.
>>>
>>> There must be some difference between these two scenarios, isn't there?
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
>>> On Behalf Of dan300f@xxxxxxx
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:44 PM
>>> To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Lake Tahoe controversy
>>>
>>> Hi all:
>>>
>>> As most members are, I for one am against cloned 300's being pawned off 
>>> as
>>> "real" 300's.  In order for the club to determine what the rules should 
>>> be for
>>> cloned cars, perhaps we should first find out what constitutes illegal 
>>> cloning.
>>> I suggest as a first step, the club invite the Michigan Attorney 
>>> General's
>>> office to give their opinion after an examination of Mr. Burke's car. 
>>> If it is
>>> deemed to be an illegal clone, case closed.  If it is deemed to be a 
>>> clone
>>> but not illegal as far as the AG's office is concerned, then the club 
>>> must make
>>> some decisions and I feel we have the right people as officers and 
>>> directors
>>> to make those decisions.
>>>
>>> Dan Reitz
>>> Northridge, CA
>>>
>>>
>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
>>> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> For list server instructions, go to 
>>> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
>>> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> For list server instructions, go to 
>>> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>> http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
> 




To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network Archive Sitemap


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.