Re: [Chrysler300] NEW 392 Hemi ???

[Rich Barber <c300@xxxxxxx>]

Might be interesting to compare actual performance of this semi-hemi and 
the original carbureted 426 in the old Challenger.

Also, doing the math--something doesn't jibe.

6.1 Liters= 372.3 cubic inches
392 cubic inches = 6.42 liters

Engine displacement must have changed by 5.3%  (2.6% diameter increase 
if all by bore)

C-300'ly,
Rich Barber
Brrentwood
1955 Chrysler C-300 (223 kW, 5.425 liters-how boring!)

Paul Holmgren wrote:

>http://www.autoblog.com/entry/1234000270066570
>
>Seems There is to be a "NEW"  392 hemi!!
>
>  
>




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/8LmulB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/