Hey, I love all you modification type people, too, almost as much as I love having this argument. So please don't think I'm mad when you read this. Sure, the 300s would have had the latest technology, but these things didn't exist for production use, therefore they are inappropriate for these cars. If you want a fuel-injected disc brake screamer with clearcoat paint, go buy a new 'vette. Seriously, they are amazing cars, and will cost about the same as really nice F. In the meantime where is your reverence for history and the people who built these cars? Isn't it a matter of pride to have one of these cars running on its original technology. I've driven my G across the country on breaker point ignition, climbed the Rockies with crossrams, and descended the Rockies with center plane brakes, thank you. I think it's amazing a 40 year-old, largely unrestored car can do this. Maybe you old coots are sick of working on points and carbs. I think it's fun. If I don't do it who will do it in 30 years? I know there are lots of professional mechanics my age who have never set points before. What about the people who designed these cars? I bet they think they did a great job, and you want to make it "better" by cobbling on a bunch of parts never intended for that car? Why can't you people respect these cars for what they are???? If they're so inadequate in your mind, maybe there's a better car out there for you. Really. And Mac, if you can rebuild a turbine, I'm sure you can 12 mpg out of AFBs. I'm an ex-college boy and self-taught wrench, and I can. If you guys want to modify a tailfin Chrysler so bad, why not do it to a Windsor or something? It's your car you can do what you want, but I just want you to think about it. There are only so many Fs to go around. Cheerfully yours, Andy __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1