Hi Rich .
I have a 62 with 405 clone , the mc is the same setup as an F . It also has air , guy before me was ambitious .He did a better job than factory .
I also looked carefully at “ Big Red” at the Pa meet ; 62 405 with manual brakes and also water heated carbs . More of a race car setup but I liked it . Frees up exhaust options and no struggles with exhaust heat problems .
FYI manual brakes with correct manual pedal ratio setup from a dodge ( fits) and stock 12 “ drums is not too bad . Good even .
However even correctly done manual brakes and any disc conversion are a horror show imho . Very hard pedal , and it travels a few inches first due to very high brake fluid requirement ( cc) of the large disc puck cylinders compared to drum cylinder piston surface area . No amount of bleeding etc fixes that . Been there . Lesson learned . That car ended up with larger bore corvette master ( big but fits with redrilling , with no boost , non ram ) to reduce travel , but that makes pedal even harder .
Lesson learned …
Back to first question , I think 60-62 exactly the same engine bay ? Right ?
I ask , as often headers ( like TTI ) are listed 62 up , why not 60 ? Something else hits?
Anyone know?
What was on 400 hp F for carb heat and brake mc ?
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 2, 2022, at 1:35 AM, Rich Barber <c300@xxxxxxx> wrote: