The tail light fins are normal for a 56 chrysler wagon. Saved them a lot of money on modificatios for low production cars.
From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rich Barber
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 6:32 PM
To: chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: FW: [Chrysler300] 300 limo? Better than a wagon?
I wonder why they didn’t put a hemi or a 300B engine in it. Split-rim wheels? Maybe from a truck? Four rows of seats? Possibly a 12-passenger limo. The taillights are unusual—some attempt to upgrade the ’55 wagon tin to sort of a finned ’56.
Rich Barber
From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Nowosacki
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 3:24 PM
To: Michael Moore
Cc: chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300 limo? Better than a wagon?
I had a 61 that I got from Freeman's in Montana back in the 80's.
I took off the luggage rack and put on a vinyl roof.
I also took out the two middle seats and put one back in facing rearward.
It was made by Armbruster Stageway Coachworks Company of FT Smith Arkansas.
It still lives today somewhere in the VA area.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 1, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Michael Moore <mmoore8425@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I can imagine a 300 limo. Or, a 300B limo.
Ebay item 201044147893
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]