Re: [Chrysler300] OEM vs. Glo-Brite

["Ron Waters" <ronbo97@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the info, Bob.

Next question.

I have heard that in addition to being incorrect for a judged restoration, the Glo-Brites are inferior to the OEM. Can someone elaborate on that ? In what ways are the aftermarkets lenses inferior ?

Thanks,

Ron


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bob Merritt 
  To: Ron Waters 
  Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 12:57 PM
  Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] OEM vs. Glo-Brite


  Factory lenses in 57 have CHRCH molded near the bottom. 
  Glo-Brite has CY3 or CY4 in that location.




    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Ron Waters 
    To: chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 11:29 AM
    Subject: [Chrysler300] OEM vs. Glo-Brite


    All -

    If I had an unused 57 Chrysler tail light lens without a box, how would I be 
    able to tell whether it was a genuine Chrysler or an aftermarket Glo-Brite ?

    Ron 


    

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm

For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:Chrysler300-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:Chrysler300-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/