
Re: Re: [Chrysler300] 300G manual trans
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: [Chrysler300] 300G manual trans
- From: Joey <Joeypilot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 12:10:08 -0600 (CST)
I think it is a valid point.
Joe Schmitt
From: Ron Stewart <rstewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006/12/18 Mon PM 07:59:07 CST
To: moparpjf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, John@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300G manual trans
wow, what a wonderfull club we have. you can get info on oil and lube. plus tax advice at no cost.. give me a break. c300ron
----- Original Message -----
From: moparpjf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: John@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 6:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300G manual trans
In a message dated 12/18/2006 5:58:43 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
John@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
I can think of another Chrysler that did not sell.it had a super powerful
motor that was impossible to keep running, a transmission that was balky, a
clutch that constantly failed, horrible build quality, terrible resale
values and in 1971, Chrysler (Plymouth) could only manage orders for a
meager 10 or so..it was called the hemi 'Cuda.
John - with all due respect, there is no way you can truly compare your
stick G with the Hemi Cuda. It just doesn't wash. As far as the 4 speed F's are
concerned, Wayne knows a hell of a lot more about them than I , but even I
know that they were never intended for the general public. They were made to
race at Daytona, and the few that were distributed, were given (not sold) to
faithful (and well known to Chrysler) Chrysler buyers of many years. They
were not a failed marketing program - they were very different and special
vehicles. The stick G's were simply something that, by most opinions, should
never have been allowed to leave the factory. It is conceivable that the added
price for the stick was there so nobody would buy it. If it were my car (and
obviously it is yours, not mine) I would have been sooo gone with the
$160,000.00 that you would not have even seen my dust.
Another consideration - had you taken that $160,000.00 it would have been a
private sale, out of sight of the IRS. Sell it at auction and you had better
be prepared to pay the income tax on whatever profit you make. That would
mean that your sales price would have to be well in excess of $190,000 or
$200,000 for you to break even with the $160,000.00 you turned down. Just a
thought.
Pete Fitch
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/
Yahoo! Groups Links
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network
Archive Sitemap