
[Chrysler300] Controversy
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chrysler300] Controversy
- From: Gary Barker <gbarker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 00:18:45 -0700
Well here's my $.12 cents worth. I feel as long as the basic Cabin is
used its still a 300. How many times would a car have to replace a
whole front clip or a rear clip or both after a wreck. That didn't make
it a non 300 car. I saw my Dad who had a frame and front end shop for
40 years cut a front frame or rear frame off and weld in a replacement
from a wrecking yard. It might not have came from a identical car .
Just one that was the same. That didn't change the name or type of car.
It was still what it was. This was standard practice before the
Unibodys came out. and even then they did a lot of frame replacement.
They either straightened the frame or replaced it. I never saw him
replace a whole frame,. not saying it wasn't done. I believe they
called those cars Totaled. But if the main car body was retained it
kept its Identify.
Just Information to think about. Gary Barker
To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network
Archive Sitemap