
Re: [Chrysler300] Lake Tahoe controversy
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chrysler300] Lake Tahoe controversy
- From: "Roger Schaaf" <obiwan10@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 20:07:49 -0700
Just found the problem. There is a box in "options" for spelling. I had
the box checked to ignore misspelled words in original text or forwarded
text. I had assumed that this would protect me from having spellcheck
merely check my text, and ignore the misspelling in any text that I was
replying to. Not the case. It also ignores misspelled words in the text
that I enter in replying to or forwarding an email. A distinction with a
difference.
Roger Schaaf
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Schaaf" <obiwan10@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Lake Tahoe controversy
> Sorry for all the misspelled words in my last emails. I do have
> spellcheck turned on in my email client(Outlook Express), but seems to be
> failing me now(does not even come up to do any checking--I became
> suspicious as I know that my spelling/typing is often not that good and it
> always came up to check before). Suspect could be related to the
> anti-spam software that I have installed. I have no excuse for sometimes
> poor grammar except that I type faster then my old mind can think. Until
> I figure out spellcheck problem, I will do a better job of proofreading my
> rants before broadcasting them. If anyone has any ideas on spellcheck
> failure to invoke on Outlook Express please post me.
>
> Thank you
> Roger Schaaf
>
> Roger Schaaf
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger Schaaf" <obiwan10@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <dan300f@xxxxxxx>; <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> <john_nowosacki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Lake Tahoe controversy
>
>
>> Let us compare this to medical advances that are current and are to come.
>>
>> I would suggest that your brain could be compared to an automobiles VIN.
>>
>> If you were to replace virtually any of your physical body parts(except
>> of course the brain) via either current or future technology, it would
>> still be you, as long as your brain(where your soul--for the believers--
>> and/or consciousness reside) then I argue that you are still you.
>>
>> The same could be said of the VIN. As long as it is legitimate and is
>> posted to a body/chassis that in all other regards would be identical to
>> a "factory" 300 then it is a 300. In particular, if the creator of this
>> reconstituted 300 did it in absolute secrecy, who would be the wiser and
>> how could this feat of alchemy be detected.
>>
>> Therefore should a charlatan who is able to do this magic anonymously be
>> rewarded for his efforts beyond what a more open and candid restorer did
>> in bringing back from the dead a VIN number from an otherwise destroyed
>> and lost 300? In simpler terms, how many of you have 300's parked in
>> your garages that may have already enjoyed this resurrection and you or
>> no one else is the wiser?
>>
>> Some of you are probably of an age where you remember the Dusenberg.
>> Many times(most??) the chassis was built by the factory and the buyer
>> then recruited a "coach builder" to build a body. These were and are
>> considered "real" Dusenbergs by all who follow this Marquee. Often a
>> later buyer or sometimes even the original owner would have a change of
>> heart about the look of a Dusey they may own. They then would re-body
>> this chassis to another body, often by a different coach builder.
>>
>> I do not know for certain, but do suspect that these are accepted as real
>> Duzzzie's and collectors of this Marque accept them as such.
>>
>> There were very few of our favorite vehicle produced, many were destroyed
>> or lost over the years. To see how many angels can dance on the head of
>> a pin in search of correctness serves none of us well. This is a hobby
>> for many/most/all of us, not a business or investment. That is why I
>> have a Torqueflight in my B and now wishing(after Lake Tahoe) that I had
>> done disc brakes last year when I replaced all my wheel cylinders. Next
>> time I will have disc brakes. Someday a future obsessive owner can
>> install a Powerflite and drum brakes. Meanwhile no one is hurt and one
>> more accurate B will remain for posterity.
>>
>> Roger Schaaf
>> Somewhat correct 300 B
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: <john_nowosacki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <dan300f@xxxxxxx>; <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 5:18 PM
>> Subject: RE: [Chrysler300] Lake Tahoe controversy
>>
>>
>>>I think the definition of 'clone' needs to be examined, too.
>>>
>>> The 'cloned' 440 six pack and 426 Hemi 'Cuda and Challenger cars I have
>>> seen still retain their original 'N' code 383 VIN numbers. Those are
>>> clones. They no longer match the configuration that left the factory on
>>> the build date.
>>>
>>> What we are talking about here is an original car that needs extensive
>>> metal replacement due to rust or accident, and will also retain its
>>> original VIN, albeit one that matches the actual configuration of the
>>> finished product as it left the factory.
>>>
>>> There must be some difference between these two scenarios, isn't there?
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>> On Behalf Of dan300f@xxxxxxx
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:44 PM
>>> To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Lake Tahoe controversy
>>>
>>> Hi all:
>>>
>>> As most members are, I for one am against cloned 300's being pawned off
>>> as
>>> "real" 300's. In order for the club to determine what the rules should
>>> be for
>>> cloned cars, perhaps we should first find out what constitutes illegal
>>> cloning.
>>> I suggest as a first step, the club invite the Michigan Attorney
>>> General's
>>> office to give their opinion after an examination of Mr. Burke's car.
>>> If it is
>>> deemed to be an illegal clone, case closed. If it is deemed to be a
>>> clone
>>> but not illegal as far as the AG's office is concerned, then the club
>>> must make
>>> some decisions and I feel we have the right people as officers and
>>> directors
>>> to make those decisions.
>>>
>>> Dan Reitz
>>> Northridge, CA
>>>
>>>
>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
>>> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> For list server instructions, go to
>>> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
>>> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> For list server instructions, go to
>>> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>> http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
>
To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network
Archive Sitemap