
Fwd: [Chrysler300] F-G-H vs J-K short rams
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: [Chrysler300] F-G-H vs J-K short rams
- From: lettercars@xxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:43:43 EST
In a message dated 3/27/2005 8:40:16 AM Eastern Standard Time, Lettercars
writes:
>
>
> In a message dated 3/26/2005 7:59:39 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> wgraefen@xxxxxxx writes:
>
> >>
>> A little further info on F-G-H versus J-K short rams.
>>
>> The F-G-H short rams were all the casting number given in the current eBay
>> auction. In '60 and '61 they were painted red. Those on my car were in
>> fact gloss red although they have been challenged to be the same semi-gloss of
>> the 375 HP cars. In '62 the short rams were the new engine blue/green
>> color. The 400HP F air cleaners were also gloss red and had taller internal
>> studs because a taller filter element was employed for high speed breathing
>> requirements. I do not know the color of the 400HP G air cleaners. I
>> presume the '62 405HP air cleaners were gold.
>>
>> The F-G-H short rams had their casting numbers on the bottom sides of the
>> rams and all were hot water heated. The F-G-H headers did not have a heat
>> port cast in their sides for carburetor heat. The J-K short rams had their
>> casting numbers on the top side of the rams and were heated by exhaust heat
>> from the manifolds.
>>
>> I have a picture taken through my left wheel well showing the water
>> fittings if anyone would care to see it. Just ask
>>
>> Hope this helps.
>>
>> Blessed Easter all y'all,
>>
>
> Hi Wayne:
> I have a couple comments on your email. Not ALL the 400HP engines had red
> air cleaners, apparently. The only two road tests I know of both show very
> clear pictures of gold stock looking air cleaners. Ref: Motor Life, June 1960,
> pg. 51 and Popular Science, April 1960, pg. 74 (Ken Fermoyle's test). The
> Fermoyle test car does not seem to have the taller air filter elements, while
> the Motor Life test car does.
> Regarding the 1962 short ram engine, the Hot Rod article where they raced a
> sport 300 with the 405 clearly shows the rams a different color than the
> engine. They appear very dark, so may not be red, but are certainly not the
> Chrysler green of the engine. Of course, this car was built up, so who knows.
> The jury is still out on whether any 300/300H came from the factory with the
> short rams. The other reference I have for 1962 is the Moons, who once saw
> the engine which came out of Bud Faubel's car. Their recollection is that it
> was the std. "green" (turquoise). I am sure they said the rams lying in the
> trunk were red.
> Finally, the ram red is a gloss paint. I have the Chrysler master on it.
> It is quite close to the Cummins engine Apex red, which is currently
> available.
> One last thing---is the only difference between the F/G/H rams and the J/K
> rams the location of the part numbers? I am not conveniently close to my ram
> K to look at it, but will next time I am at the "barn". The water heating
> adapters just bolted on the the bottom of the plenum below the carbs where
> ordinarily the tubes/elbows would go, didn't they?
> Happy Easter. 300y, Gil
I'll try again! Gil
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Help save the life of a child. Support St. Jude Children's Research Hospital's
'Thanks & Giving.'
http://us.click.yahoo.com/6iY7fA/5WnJAA/Y3ZIAA/8LmulB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network
Archive Sitemap