Re: [Chrysler300] 300M Special & Horsepower

["Magik Draggin'" <longrammopar@xxxx>]

If I may, I would like to attempt to clarify my position on this matter.

I am by no means suggesting the "M" is not a fine automobile. Having had 
the priviledge of test driving one recently, and having owned a 
couple-year-old 300G back in the '60s, I can honestly say there is really no 
comparison when it comes to handling and smoothness and quietness of ride 
and all the other amenities that have become important to new-car buyers 
over the past 40 years.

All I was addressing with my rant concerning my present "G" compared to the 
"M", is straight-line acceleration and nothing else. Honestly, the only 
thing my "G" can do better than the "M" besides out accelerate it, is garner 
a lot of enthusiastic thumbs up from appreciative bystanders and other 
drivers. Nobody honked and waved at me while I was driving the "M" around 
town.

Just felt like I needed to set the record straight where I was coming from 
on this.

Karl

> From: "Don Warnaar" <300country@xxxx>
> To: tfm@xxxx, Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300M Special & Horsepower
> Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 09:28:31 -0500
>
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> Really enjoyed your message which compared the different eras of cars that
> you have owned (or still do). Excellent perspective on the changes that
> have taken place over the years.
>
> Don Warnaar
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp