Re: [Chrysler300] Gas Chemistry & other unrelated issues

[Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry John, you're wrong, It does directly concern our cars, our hobby 
and our lives.

The thread has evolved, but so has the restrictions placed on us and 
our cars. The lively discussion shows that it's of interest to the 
members, and we see what others have to put up with.

This directly effects how each of your states will look at things. Most 
of the politicians don't have the time or the knowledge to determine 
what is proper, and so, vote along with the myth. Cars are the problem! 
This must stop! None ever checks  to see if the Air Quality has 
changed, made worse by cars or if even the concepts are right.
It's much easier to adopt CA rules than to create rules which are 
workable for a given area.
They can place heavy restrictions on older cars, since there aren't 
many and thump their chests "Look at how we are protecting the public".

Keep looking over your shoulder, they are coming!

For the life of me, I can't understand the logic of  adding 10% corn 
squeezings to a gal of gas, when it doesn't burn as well and will take 
1.1 gals to go the same distance. Oh Wait! I get it. You raise the 
price of gas, "corn" it down, and sell more gas to make up for the 
crappy milage. Then vote themselves a pay raise to cover the extra 
costs.  With all the additives, they're getting 100 gals of gas out of 
a barrel these days, I guess. There's not much gas in it. (I know 
better)

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for EPA standards, rules, low or no 
emissions, and clean air. Just base it on good science, and we've about 
beat the cars to death, let's go regulate the real offenders.

Alright, I'll listen to you and we can go back to boring again.

Ray

On Jan 5, 2005, at 4:54 PM, John
  wrote:

> I would like to kindly remind the listmembers that the purpose of the 
> list
> is to discuss matters DIRECTLY related to our Chrysler 300's. Seems 
> that the
> thread which started on octane and? gasoline chemistry has now evolved 
> into
> a general argument and discussion re:? air pollution and California
> regulations,? and has strayed from "directly related" to "very directly
> unrelated".? Could those that wish to continue the argument please do
> privately among themselves?
>
> Thank you in advance for your cooperation !
>
> John Hertog
> ECC
> Chrysler 300 Club Int'l Inc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go 
> tohttp://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> 	? 	To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/
> ?
> 	? 	To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ?
> 	? 	Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to theYahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Give the gift of life to a sick child. 
Support St. Jude Children's Research Hospital's 'Thanks & Giving.'
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5iY7fA/6WnJAA/Y3ZIAA/8LmulB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/